30 Asia TheEconomistFebruary12th 2022
unrulybjpdeputiesfromthebuildingfora
year,untiltheSupremeCourtintervened.
SowhatdoIndia’s5,000electedstate
andnationallegislatorsdo,iftheyspend
solittletimelegislating?Manyarededicat
edtoservingtheirconstituents.Butmany
appearmoredevotedtowinningbackwhat
theyspentgettingvotedin,andmore.Ac
cordingtotheAssociationforDemocratic
Reforms,a researchgroup,a record43%of
mps who wonseatsin the 2019 general
electionhadbeenchargedwithacrime,
with29%bookedforgraveoffencessuchas
rapeandmurder.Thisrepresenteda 109%
increaseonthecohortoftenyearsearlier.
Crime seems to pay: analysis shows
thata candidatewitha criminalrecordis
threetimesmorelikelyto winthanone
without.Similarly,onewithdeclaredas
setsofmorethan50mrupees($670,000)is
sixtimesmorelikelytosucceedthanone
with less. Term after term, compulsory
declarationsofassetsrevealsuspiciously
hugerisesinthewealthofincumbents.
If richesandruthlessnessarecrucialfor
nabbingvotesatstreetlevel,theyarealso
neededatthetop.Here,thebjpmusttakea
bow,havingstrucka gusherwithaninge
niousmechanismcalledelectoralbonds.
Introducedin2018,ostensiblyasa reform
toweedoutillicitcash,theschemeallows
forunlimited,opaquefinancingofpoliti
calparties.A reporterwouldbeunable,for
example,totracelinksbetweena billion
airewhosefortunespikedaftersecuring
lucrativedealsfromthegovernment,and
hisor herdonations to enabling politi
cians.Thesoleindicatorofpoliticalfund
ing that is now disclosed is the total
amountreceived(seechart2).Notsurpris
ingly,therulingpartyisgainingthelion’s
share.In 2020 thebjp’sdeclaredassetsof
$655moutweighedthoseofthenext 51 po
liticalpartiescombined.Morestriking,its
stashroseby443%injustfiveyears.
In most democracies, courts would
havetossedout electoralbondsasafla
grantobstructionofvoters’righttoknow
who wasfundingtheir politicalparties.
Butinanothersignofcreakingdemocratic
infrastructure,India’sSupremeCourthas
draggedouthearingsontheissueindefi
nitely.Norhavethetopjudgesbotheredto
takeupotherobviouschallengestonormal
democratic functions,suchasthestrip
pingofstatehoodfromandbifurcationof
theerstwhilestateofJammuandKashmir
in2019.Lowercourtshavesometimesbeen
morevigilant,butnotalways.
Perhapsnotsurprisingly,India’sdemo
craticdriftisreflectedinitsdiplomacy.De
spitemuchbackslappingwithdemocratic
leaders,andmembershipingroupssuch
as the Quad, a club of big IndoPacific
countriesworriedbyanincreasinglybel
ligerentChina,Indiaoftendeclinestojoin
otherdemocracieswhenitcomesto,for
example,condemningtherecentmilitary
coupinnextdoorMyanmarorthethreats
byRussiaagainstUkraineandotherneigh
bouringdemocracies.
AccordingtothecountkeptbyAmeri
ca’sStateDepartmentofvotingattheun
GeneralAssembly,overthepastfiveyears
India hasmatched America’sownvotes
just28%ofthetime.Thatcomparesto23%
forChina,30%forRussiaandover50%for
morestalwartdemocraticallies.This“co
incidenceratio”ishardlya goldstandard
for democracy: America annoys other
countries for arange ofreasons. Butit
seemstoreflectthedownondemocracy
viewsofmanyIndians,whorecentlytold
pollstersthattheywouldbya largemargin
behappytoabolishParliamentandaccept
armyrule,morethanitdoestheconstitu
tionthathasforsevendecadespreserved
theircountryfromjustsucha fate. n
Cash cow
India, national political parties’ declared income
2019-20, $m
Source:Associationof Democratic Reforms
2
Bahujan Samaj Party
Nationalist Congress
Pa r t y
Trinamool Congress
Communist Party of
India (Marxist)
Congress
Bharatiya Janata Party
5004003002001000
S
nails andfermentedfish,bamboo
shavings and cured buffalo skin: these
are among the delights that Wannee
Junrut has laid out on trays at her stall in
Lao Market in Bangkok, Thailand’s cap
ital, every morning for the past 28 years.
Hawking is the family business: Ms
Wannee’s mother tended the stall before
her, and her children are also in the
trade. They may soon need to find other
work, however. The local government is
threatening to demolish their stall.
When the Thai army seized power in
2014, it vowed to bring order to the
streets of Bangkok. Tens of thousands of
hawkers ply their trade on the city’s
roads, selling not just food but every
thing from clothing to cleaning products.
Bangkok’s local government reckons
they are a nuisance, responsible for all
manner of ills including bad hygiene and
obstructing traffic. In 2014 it launched a
campaign called “returning walkways to
the public” and started evicting hawkers,
licence or no licence. It claims to have
since closed nearly 75% of informal
markets and shooed away some 12,000
vendors, nearly 60% of the total.
Hawkers are “a healthandsafety
issue”, says Ton Panon, a property devel
oper. He lists a litany of complaints: they
force pedestrians onto the road; they do
not clean up after themselves; they pour
cooking oil down the drains, clogging
sewers and exacerbating flooding (ven
dors poohpooh these claims). He does
not want them banned from the city—
“They are a way of life here”—but wishes
they could be relocated to designated
food courts and markets. Many Bang
kokiansshareMr Ton’s frustrations.
Facebook groups such as ThailandFoot
path, which chronicle broken and
blocked pavements, have hundreds of
thousands of members.
Vendors and skint backpackers will
suffer if the stalls vanish. So, too, will
ordinary Bangkokians. The city’s resi
dents get nearly half of their weekly
meals from street vendors, suggests one
survey. Many stalls cater to people with
low incomes. Besides, banishing hawk
ing from pavements will not magically
render them safe and passable: Bang
kok’s motorcyclists seem convinced that
they are an extension of the carriageway.
StreethawkersinBangkok
Sidewalk ballet
B ANGKOK
The city is trying to bring some order to its pavements
Quit stalling