The Sunday Times February 13, 2022 23
NEWS REVIEW
Kurt Zouma was
filmed kicking his
Bengal cat. Mary
Bale, below, was
caught on CCTV
McWhorter
says racism
is no longer
the obstacle
it once was
I
n the new Netflix series The
Woman in the House Across
the Street from the Girl in
the Window, there’s a sex
scene so graphic and
lengthy that Kristen Bell, the
actress involved, ended up
apologising to a viewer.
The coitus uninterruptus
begins at the end of the fifth
episode. Bell’s character, a
lonely alcoholic called Anna,
kisses the mysterious “bad
boy” Rex on her doorstep.
This leads to a sexual
smorgasbord — in the shower,
on the stairs, in the window
seat, on the kitchen table —
prompting a fan to tweet:
“Just watched Kristen Bell get
absolutely RAILED with my
girlfriend and my mom in the
room.” Bell, 41, replied:
“Hahahahaha sorry dude.”
This seems to be a growing
danger on Netflix. The
comedy-drama Sex Education,
a fourth series of which is in
the works, began with a
ceiling-shaking bang and an
explicit sex scene just 30
seconds in.
Since then the teenagers of
Moordale Secondary School
have come together for faked
A study by pathologists at the Royal
Veterinary College confirmed Usborne’s
theory in December. By which point the
now defenestrated Cressida Dick’s Met
had wasted £500,000 and three years.
But Usborne is a rare example of some-
one having the last laugh after getting on
the wrong side of the cat-owning commu-
nity. A 2019 Netflix documentary focused
on an extreme example of cat-crossing.
Don’t F**k with Cats tells the tale of Luka
Rocco Magnotta, a Canadian who, as a
teenager in 2010, started posting clips of
him torturing and killing kittens. The
videos set off an international manhunt,
with amateur online cat sleuths helping
the police track down Magnotta — but not
before he had murdered and dismem-
bered Jun Lin, a 33-year-old student
living in Montreal. The suggestion is the
sleuths might not have bothered if
for you. And even if they don’t, Britain’s
rabid army of cat-lovers will. And they
take no prisoners.
It has never been fully explained why,
in 2010, Mary Bale, a 45-year-old bank
worker from Coventry, decided to throw
a stranger’s cat in a wheelie bin, only to
be captured on CCTV. After Lola the four-
year-old tabby was freed from her
15-hour incarceration, Bale was fined
£250, but that was the least of her
worries. “Moment of madness ruined my
life, says wheelie-bin cat woman,”
reported The Coventry Telegraph seven
months after the event. Her mother’s
house was besieged by journalists. A
Facebook group was set up called Death
To Mary Bale. She had to resign from her
job with the Royal Bank of Scotland. The
Independent asked: “Is Mary Bale the
most evil woman in Britain?” Another
question was never satisfactorily
answered: who has a CCTV camera
trained on their bins?
And consider the moral panic that
gripped the nation when the so-killed
Croydon Cat Killer was on the loose,
allegedly massacring 500 cats over a
four-year period. When the journalist
Simon Usborne suggested in The Guard-
ian in 2018 that this cat-killer might be
just, you know, some foxes, the reaction
was intense.
“I’ve occasionally tackled contentious
stuff as a journalist, but the only time I’ve
been called an ‘absolute f***ing wanker’,
‘scum’ and ‘everything that is wrong with
this world’ was when I dared to question
the theory that a lone killer was driving
up and down the country picking off
moggies,” says Usborne. “At one point
the cat-loving couple leading the investi-
gation suggested that the killer could be a
journalist.”
Never
mess
with a
moggie
The footballer Kurt Zouma is finding out the
hard way. Cross a cat and they — or the
nation’s mewling mob of cat-lovers — will
have their revenge, writes Martin Hemming
O
n Tuesday night at the Lon-
don Stadium, the West Ham
defender Kurt Zouma sank
to the turf after a heavy chal-
lenge. The Watford fans at
the away end didn’t miss a
beat. They responded with a
chant unlikely to have been
heard before on even the
roughest of Britain’s ter-
races: “That’s how your cat feels.”
Before last week, Zouma was a 27-year-
old French footballer. Now he is Kurt the
Cat Kicker, after a Snapchat video
emerged of him — seemingly for a laugh —
drop-kicking one of his pet Bengal cats
across his kitchen floor.
Let he who hasn’t given his cat a gentle
nudge with a slipper when it is mewling
for its morning Purina One adult chicken
and whole grains, and scratching the
kitchen cupboards, cast the first stone.
But if it wasn’t already self-evident that
booting a cat up the bum is a bad idea —
and especially having your brother film it
and post it on social media — Zouma has
learnt the hard way.
With a ruthlessness, precision and
alacrity that the Metropolitan Police
could only dream of, the RSPCA swooped
to confiscate Zouma’s two pussies. He
was fined the maximum two weeks’
wages by West Ham — said to be
£250,000. At the time of writing, more
than 300,000 people have signed a peti-
tion calling for the footballer to be prose-
cuted, and the RSPCA is weighing up
whether to press charges.
Some believe a black cat crossing your
path means bad luck. But if history, or at
least the front pages of the tabloids, is
anything to go by, it’s safest never to get
on the wrong side of any flavour of feline.
Because, mark my words, they will come
The new
anti-racism
is a danger
to us all
So says the controversial
intellectual John McWhorter,
whose new book is sending
shockwaves through America’s
‘woke’ left, writes Josh Glancy
Magnotta had murdered only a student.
It’s not just footballers, West Midlands
bank workers and psychopaths. The Brit-
ish legal system also throws some serious
shade on Tiddles. Under section 170 of
the Road Traffic Act 1988, if a driver runs
over a dog — or horse, cow, ass, mule,
sheep, pig or goat — they are obliged to
report it to the police. Squash a cat and
you need only give the council a
courtesy call. A petition in 2020 failed to
rectify this canine-biased injustice, with
the government responding that it had
“no current plans to amend the Road
Traffic Act 1988 to grant cats the same
status as dogs”. Miaow! Larry the Down-
ing Street cat was thought to be unim-
pressed. Could he be the one leaking
those party videos to the Daily Mirror?
I’m currently having my own brush
with feline vengeance. We have just
moved to a house without a catflap, so
Tallulah, our little black rescue cat, has
been reduced to doing her business in a
litter tray, in full view of the breakfast
table. When I write “in”, Tallulah has
interpreted this as “near” or “smeared
down the side of ”. I can’t help but think
she knows exactly what she’s doing.
It’s time we gave cats the respect they
deserve. They are not glorified cuddly
toys for our social-media feeds (though,
as any black-cat owner will know, Tallu-
lah photographs terribly). They are
powerful, capricious, vengeful and
slutty. A colleague reports that his cat fre-
quently returns home smelling of some-
one else’s cigarette smoke.
We should stop thinking of cats less as
the cute, benign, slightly dim Mog from
Judith Kerr’s children’s stories, and more
as Behemoth from Mikhail Bulgakov’s
The Master and Margarita, a giant, pistol-
toting, vodka-drinking beast in league
with the devil who is, to borrow Netflix’s
asterisks, a f***ing nutcase that everyone
should be terrified of.
We finally got a high-spec catflap fitted
on Thursday, which involved a whole
new pane of double glazing and me hand-
ing over £400. Is Tallulah grateful? She
just stares at it and continues to crap in-
accurately inside my house, plotting her
next move.
form of anti-racism,” he
writes. The new religion has
its “elect”, he argues, those
enlightened enough to see
this fallen world as it truly is.
It has a clergy: racial theorists
like Ibram X Kendi, Ta-Nehisi
Coates and the (white) author
of White Fragility, Robin
DiAngelo. And it has an
“original sin”, in this case
white privilege.
This ideology is like
“smallpox”, he says, arguing
that wokeism has “much less
distance to the Nazis, Mao
and Stalin than many of us
think”. It is a “fungus”,
promoted by people with a
“very thin, nasty idea of how
society should be run”.
Kendi, perhaps the most
prominent anti-racism
advocate in America, has
excoriated McWhorter on
Twitter, attacking his writing
for “degrading black people”
and claiming that racism is
“no longer a serious
problem”.
McWhorter, for his part,
has no problem with
concepts such as white
privilege or structural racism.
He acknowledges them but
just isn’t very interested in
dwelling on them. “It’s not
that racism doesn’t exist, but
it is hardly the impediment
that it once was,” he says.
Similarly, he sees Black
Lives Matter as a naive but
well-meaning organisation
that has suffered from
“mission creep” and “drifted
into certain financial
irregularities”.
Because of his views,
McWhorter has been called
an Uncle Tom, and worse. Do
the slurs bother him? “They
definitely don’t hurt because
they have so little to do with
who I am,” he says. “It’s a
cartoon.”
J
ohn McWhorter might be
the most interesting man
in America right now,
sitting as he does at the
fulcrum of America’s
swirling racial debate.
McWhorter is a black,
Democrat-voting, liberal
intellectual with a column in
The New York Times and a
fierce admiration for the
heroes of the civil-rights
movement. But he is also a
withering critic of the post-
George Floyd racial
awakening, loathes
“wokeism” and has become a
public enemy of the radical
left. Some view him as a smug
traitor; others as a rare voice
of sanity and moderation in a
tempest of excess.
As the fightback against
wokeness, hyper-awareness
to inequalities of race, sex
and other forms of prejudice,
gathers pace in America,
McWhorter, 56, has become
perhaps the most compelling
counter-revolutionary voice.
He is a professor of
linguistics at Columbia
University in New York. He’s
also a prolific author,
broadcaster, public
intellectual and, in his spare
time, cabaret impresario:
McWhorter enjoys taking his
two daughters to musicals on
Broadway and met his wife at
a singalong piano bar. He
speaks with imperious
erudition and writes with
admirable clarity.
Whatever you think of his
views, and they’re certainly
contentious, McWhorter has
become essential reading for
anyone trying to make sense
of the race debate in America
and, because of the way our
cultural conversation takes its
cues from across the Atlantic,
Britain too.
His latest book, Woke
Racism: How a New Religion
Has Betrayed Black America,
is a slender volume but his
argument is challenging.
McWhorter views America’s
new ideology of race, which
he terms “third-wave anti-
racism”, as something more
akin to a religion than a
practical movement.
First-wave anti-racism
fought slavery and
segregation. Second-wave
anti-racism, in the 1970s and
1980s, taught America that
being racist is a moral flaw.
The third wave teaches that
racism is baked into the
structure of society, making
all whites who aren’t actively
fighting it complicit in its
persistence.
This latest generation of
anti-racism represents a
dangerous wrong turn in
McWhorter’s view. It has
given us cancel culture,
microaggressions and a
culture of easy offence. It
patronises black people, he
argues, by treating them as
eternal victims. Most
importantly, it hinders
progress for black America
through its impractical
demands and the distractions
of religious fervour.
“There’s been a detour
into striking a pose, showing
that you are aware of an
injustice as opposed to being
sincerely interested in
helping real black people,”
he says.
McWhorter has plenty of
examples of this harm at his
fingertips when he Zooms in
from his book-lined study. An
obvious one is the call to
“defund the police”, which
he argues is not supported by
most people living in areas
with high crime rates. “And
yet a certain kind of person
insists on calling to defund
the police,” he says. “Because
when you’re saying that
you’re showing that you
know racism exists. We’re
operating on the basis of what
I think is a religion, rather
than engaging with reality on
the ground.”
When McWhorter uses the
word religion, this is more
than just an analogy. “An
anthropologist would see no
difference in type between
Pentecostalism and this new
He attributes his counter-
consensual views to a
lawyerly desire for coherence
and not being “a joiner”. He
also thinks growing up in a
racially integrated area of
Philadelphia helped.
“White people don’t scare
me,” he says. “For a lot of
black people, either white
people do scare them or they
pretend that they do.”
McWhorter merrily applies
his critique of wokeism to the
daily culture war news cycle.
He was irked by the campaign
waged against the podcast
host Joe Rogan for using the
n-word, which he argues
deliberately misunderstood
the fact that Rogan was
referring to and describing,
not actually using, the word.
He also objected to Whoopi
Goldberg’s suspension from
an American television talk
show because of remarks she
made about the Holocaust
not being a racist crime.
“Her suspension was an
example of a prosecutorial
strain in today’s woke culture
that has gone way, way too
far,” he says. “She made a
mistake, she apologised.
What happened wasn’t a
crime. She should have been
smacked on the hand. We’re
in Galileo territory: this is
pursuing heretics, not having
mature discussions in
society.”
Woke Racism is published by
Forum at £14.99
having less sex than previous
generations. A
study published in The British
Medical Journal in
May 2019 suggested that
nearly a third of men and
women had not had sex in the
previous month, up from a
quarter in 2001.
The pandemic exacerbated
the trend, with the National
Survey of Sexual Attitudes
and Lifestyles study reporting
that the number of one-night
stands had fallen. People
reporting a new partner in the
previous four weeks halved in
2020 to 4 per cent.
Gunsaullus believes that
lockdown accelerated the
trend for people to want
vicarious pleasure on screen.
In June 2020 365 Days, a
Polish erotic drama criticised
for glamorising sex trafficking
and rape, was a surprise hit
for Netflix. “Even just kissing
somebody became
dangerous,” Gunsaullus says.
“So it’s a combination of
factors: the Covid lockdown,
porn and our busy lives.
There’s also an issue with
vulnerability: when it comes
to showing up in front of
Netflix is
now Sexflix
— and we’re
gagging for it
We may be having less sex in real life,
but what we’re streaming is getting
steamier, says Rosamund Urwin
Reinventing Sex for Women.
“Netflix is blunt with using
sex as a way of getting
people’s attention ... We were
already building in this
direction of more sexual
content in our regular viewing
— all generations have become
more used to porn, especially
the young. Watching sex on a
screen has become more
normalised, especially in the
past ten years.”
Even staid old Auntie is
following suit. After the
adaptation of Sally Rooney’s
Normal People was a monster
hit for the BBC in April 2020,
the broadcaster is bringing an
adaptation of her 2017 debut
novel, Conversations with
Friends, to the screen in May,
starring Jemima Kirke. The
trailer was unveiled last week,
suggesting the series will be as
sex-filled as its predecessor,
which featured 41 minutes —
someone counted — of
“amorous action” in its 12
episodes.
But while we may be
watching more sex on
screen, behavioural
studies in the UK and the
US suggest that adults are
orgasms, full frontal nudity
and a masturbatory montage.
Then there’s the Regency
romp Bridgerton — nicknamed
Bonkerton — which returns
for a second series next
month. The hero of the first
series, Simon, played by Regé-
Jean Page, managed to make
many viewers swoon simply
by licking a spoon.
The streaming platform
also hosts the Mexican
adultery thriller Dark Desire,
of which one critic wrote
“there’s so much sex, you
struggle to find some story”;
the Polish comedy Sexify,
about a student trying to
develop an algorithm for the
female orgasm; and Sex/Life,
an American drama about a
suburban mother yearning
for her past life with a former
boyfriend. Netflix even has a
dedicated “steamy” section to
browse.
Has Netflix become Sexflix?
“It was always quite sexy but
it does feel like there is a lot
more sex now — just look at
the names of shows,” says
Jennifer Gunsaullus, a
sociologist and the author of
From Madness to Mindfulness:
Metadata
analysts
‘tag’ shows
that have
sex in
Kristen Bell, below,
and Sex/Life, top, are
drawing in viewers
1 3, 202 2
This week’s question:
Is there too much sex
on TV?
Have your say at
sundaytimes.co.uk/poll
Mary Bale’s life was ruined
after she put a cat in a bin
another person, with all of
your emotional messiness
and bodily insecurities, that is
a very vulnerable thing to do
and I think as a society we are
becoming less skilled at that,
especially the younger
generations who have this
example of porn.” She notes
that sex-filled Netflix shows
roughly split into two: those
portraying the awkwardness
of relationships, such as Sex
Education, and those offering
a dark fantasy, such as
365 Days.
Netflix, of course, is in the
business of giving its
customers what they want. Its
algorithms are designed to
lead us to the next thing we
might like, based on what we,
and others with similar tastes,
have watched before. They
don’t take into account our
age or sex.
To this end, explains Tom
Harrington, head of television
at the media research
company Enders Analysis,
Netflix employs scores of
metadata analysts, also
known as “taggers”, whose
job is to watch programmes
and films and categorise
them. They log everything
from actors and locations, to
particular emotions, trends or
narrative devices, and
whether a series or film
qualifies as “steamy”.
In this case, what that
viewer wants seems to be sex
— maybe not in real life, but
certainly on screen. Just be
careful if you’re watching
with mother.
NETFLIX