THE MECHANICAL FALLACY
99towered into the sky far above
the churches, the
magnitude of whose
interiors they pretended
to
express, and buildings which, in reality,
were com-
posed ofseveralstories, were
comprehended within
asingleorder.
Itisuseless
tominimisethe
extenttowhichsuchpracticesweretypicaloftheRenaissance.
Although
it isonlyin Italy, and in
theseventeenth century,
thatthe mostglaringexamplesaretobefound,
yet
the principleswhich thenreachedtheir
climaxwere
latent,andeven,inmanycases,visiblefromits
earliestperiod. Theyareinherentinthepoint
ofviewfromwhich the Renaissance approached the question
ofaesthetics. And, onthecontinuous
planeofincreas-ing'insincerity'whichthestyle,asawhole,presents,itwouldbeunreasonableandarbitrarytoselect
thispointorthatasthelimitofjustifiable
licence,andtodecryall that came
after, while applauding
whatwentbefore. This,nonetheless,isthe
compromisewhichisfashionableamongthosecriticswhofeelthat
concessionsmustbemade, bothto
thestricturesofthe'Scientific'criticismontheonehand,andtotheacknowledged fame ofthe'Golden
Age'
of archi-tectureontheother. Butsuch
aprocedureismis-leading,andevadestherealissue. Itis,on
thecon-trary, imperativetorecognisethat
the Renaissanceclaimedandexercisedthislicencefromthefirst,andto make the closest
examination
of the doctrines