THE
ETHICAL
FALLACY
123asrelevant
toarchitecturaltaste? Howfaronits
own
principlesdiditestablish
acaseagainst
Renaissancearchitecture
? Andcanthose
principlesfindplaceatallinarationalaesthetic
? These arethe
questions
whichnowrequire
solution,ifweare
toguardagainst,ordojusticeto,astill
powerfulfactorincontemporarytaste. For although
few seriousstudents
ofarchi-tecturewouldnowconfess
themselvesRuskinian,andnonewould
endorsethosegrandanathemas
withoutreserve, the phrases of Ruskin's
currency are not!extinct. In milder language, certainly,
but witheven lesssense
thatsuch ideasrequireargumentorproof,theaxiomsarereiterated: architectureisstillthe'distinctivelypolitical
'art,itsvirtue,to'reflecta
nationalaspiration,'and allthe faultsandmeritsofaclassornationareseenreflectedinthearchitec-turethatservestheiruse.^>
Itissignificantofthenowaxiomaticcharacterofsuchideas
thatwefindthemincludedbycourtesyintheworksofwriterswhoseactualbiasandmethodareutterlyopposedtotheethical. ThusProfessorMoore,inoneofthefewvolumeswhichhavebeendevotedtoconsideringRenaissancearchitectureasadistinctiveart,baseshiswholetreatmentquiteconsistentlyuponamechanicalidealofarchitecture: anidealinwhichamostscholarlystudyofGothic
hasnodoubtconfirmedhim.Fitnessofconstruction
ishissoleandinvariable
testofvalue. Notonewordoccurs
throughoutwithregard
toanysingle
buildingaboutthekindofhumancharacteritindicatesorpromotes. Yet
heprefacesthisscientificwork,notbyanydeclarationofmechanicalfaith,butbyarapidliturgicalrecitationofalltheethicalformulae.'The
finearts,'hesays,'
derivetheirwholecharacter'from'thehistoricalante-cedents,moral conditions.. .and religious beliefsofthepeoplesandepochs
towhichtheybelong'(theaestheticsenseofapeopleapparentlycontributesnothingtothecharacteroftheirwork)
:'
Into