i62
THE
ARCHITECTURE OF
HUMANISM
Thereis,infact,a
true,notafalse,
analogybetween
ethical and aesthetic
values: the correspondence
[between them may even amount
to an identity.
The
'
dignity
'
ofarchitectureisthe same
'
dignity
'
I
thatwerecognise
incharacter. Thus,whenoncewe
havediscerned it aesthetically inarchitecture,there
mayariseintheminditsmoralecho. Buttheecho
is
dependentontheevokingsound
;
andthesound
in this case is the original voice of architecture,
whoselanguageisMass,Space,Line,andCoherence,
j
These arequalities in
architecture which requirea
gift for their understanding and a trained gift for
theirunderstandingaright: qualitiesinwhichmen
I
were
not 'intended
without excessive difficulty to
knowgoodthingsfrombad,'andbynomeanstobe
estimatedbytheself-confident
scrutinyofanethical
conscience
;
qualities, nevertheless, so closelyallied
to certain valueswe attach to life,
thatwhen
once
the aesthetic judgment has
perceived them rightly,
thevitalconscience
mustapprove,andbyapproving
can enrich. To
refuse this enrichment,
or
moral
echo, of
aesthetic'valuesis one
fallacy
;
the fallacy,,
ofthecriticsofFact.
Toimaginethatbecausethe
'
conscience
'
canenrich
thosevalues
it
has,onthat
account, the
slightest power,
with itsown eyes,to
seethem,
isthecontrary,
theEthicalFallacy
of
taste.
Moralitydeepens
thecontent
ofarchitecturalex-
perience. But
architecture
in its turn can extend