i66 THE
ARCHITECTURE OF
HUMANISM
was alive. Style itself, and not
the succession ofstyles, engrossed
men's thought. The sequence, as
a sequence, was not studied.
But when, in thenineteenthcentury, thesequence
wascutshortanda period of
*revivals' wasinitiated, the standardsof taste weremultiplied and
confused;pastthingsbecame
contemporary with present. Sequence—the
historicalrelationofstyleto
style—nowwasstudied,
when sequence itselfhad ceased tobe.Ifthedif-ferentstages of
ahistorical evolution are broughtsimultaneouslytolife—^ifonlytothe
lifeofchatteringspectres—style no longer can affirm its
rights un-questioned. Claims that oncewere owned mustthen beadjusted,challenged andcompared.When
architecture,once a cleardirectingvoice,isheardtospeak'with tongues' forgotten and confused, menmust hearken for interpretation, andfind it, then,inthesoundofeverypassinggustofthought.Threesuchsoundsinthewindwerethosewehaveexamined,eachofthembornefromasourceremotefrom architecture itself. Poetical enthusiasm, thezealandcuriosityofscience,theawakenedstirofasocialconscience,arevoicesinthecriticismofarchi-tecturestill
tobediscerned. Butthephilosophyofevolution—vastinitssweep,universalinitsseemingefficacy,andnowlessaninstrumentof sciencethan
anatural process of the unconsciousmind—
^wasasteadier wind more strong than these. What
has