212 THE ARCHITECTURE OF
HUMANISM
'
cabined,cribbed,confined
'
delightsus,
forthevery
reason thattheidea isvividlyconveyed.
Nor
does
Samsonpainfully
troubleourpeace,when
'
ThdsetwomassiePillars
Withhorribleconvulsiontoandfro
Hetugged,heshook,tilldowntheycameanddrew
- Thewholeroofafterthemwithburstofthunder
Upontheheadsofallwhosatebeneath.'
Clearly,then,ourdiscomfortinthe
presence
ofsuch
architecturecannot spring merelyfrom the idea of
restrictionorinstability.
But neitherdoes it derivefrom anactual weak-
nessorrestrictioninourimmediateexperience. Itis
disagreeable to have our
movements thwarted,
to
losestrength orto collapse
;
buta room £ftyfeet
square and seven feet high does not restrict
our
actualmovements,
andthe
sight
ofagranitebuilding
raised (apparently) on a glass shop-frontdoes not
causeustocollapse.
Thereisinstability
—or
the
appearanceofit; but
it isinthebuilding. Thereisdiscomfort, butitis
in ourselves. What then has occurred?
The con-
clusion seemsevident. The
concrete spectacle has
done
whatthe mere ideacould not: it has
stirred
ourphysical memory. Ithas awakened
in us, not
indeedanactualstateofinstability
orofbeingover-
loaded,butthatconditionofspiritwhich
inthepast
hasbelongedtoouractual
experiencesofweakness,