INTRODUCTION
13"artshasbeen for themost
part no more than an
incidentin, oraconsequence of,thechangeswhichmen'sminds have undergone
with regard to thesemore stimulating and insistent interests. Hardlyever, savein matters
ofmere
technique, has archi-tecture been studied sincerely for itself. Thusthesimplestestimatesofarchitectureareformed
throughadistortingatmosphereofunclearthought. Axioms,holdingtrueinprovincesotherthanthatofart,andarising historicallyin these, have
successively beenextendedbyaseriesoffalseanalogies intothepro-vince
ofarchitecture
;andtheseaxioms,unanalysedandmutuallyinconsistent,confuseouractualexperi-enceatthesource.Totracethefull
measureofthatconfusion, andifpossible tocorrectit, istherefore,the firstobjectofthisbook. We
enter
alimboofdeadbutstillhaunt-ing controversies, of old andghostly dogmatisms,whichmosteffectivelydarken the counselofcriticsbecausetheirpresenceisoftenleastperceived. Itistimethat thesespectreswerelaid,orelse,bywhat-evernecessarylibationsofexacter thinking,broughthonestlytolife.The path will
then be clear to attempt,withjlesscertainty of misconception,a statementoftheaesthetic valueson whichRenaissance architecture^isbased.Tofollow,
in concretedetail, thisArchitectureof