CHAPTER II
THE ROMANTIC
FALLACYTheRenaissanceproducedno
theoryofarchitecture.Itproduced
treatisesonarchitecture: FraGiocondo,Alberti, Palladio, Serlio,andmanyothers, notonly
built,
but wrote. But the style theybuilt in wastooalivetoadmitofanalysis,toopopulartorequiredefence.They give us rules, but not principles.
Theyhadnoneedoftheory,fortheyaddressedthem-
selves
totaste. Periods of vigorous production,absorbedinthe practicalandtheparticular,donotencourageuniversalthought.The death of the Renaissance tradition should
have
enabledmen,forthefirsttime,totakeageneralviewofitshistory,andtodefineitsprinciples,if
notwith scientificexactness, at leastwithout provinci-alityorbias. Ofthe causes which precludedthemfrom
sodoing,thefirstwastheprolongedascendencyof
the RomanticMovement.tfTheRomantic Movementcreated,
inallthe arts,a
deep unrest,
prompting mento newexperiments
;and,followingontheexperiments,
therecameagreatenlargement of critical
theory, seeking tojustify37