THE ROMANTIC
FALLACY
67itwhereveritmightbe
found. As in the
cult ofthe past, so,
too, in this cult of
the 'natural,' itwas
literature,the trueinstrument
ofthe
RomanticMovement,thatledthe
way.|"Itis
evidentthatarchitecture
andthecriticismofarchitecturehave reflected
thispoeticchange.The
formal
garden, necessarily, was the first
object ofattack. IntheRenaissancetaste
thegardenwasanextensionofthemain
design. Itwasamiddletermbetween architecture and Nature.The transition
from house to landscape
was logically effected bycombining
at this point formality of design
withnaturalness of material.The garden was thus an
integral, anarchitectural, elementin the art.
ButwhenNature, through poetry,acquired
itsprestige,the formalgarden
stood condemned. Unpleasingin itself, becaiise'unnatural,' it wasin addition
abarbarousviolence,aruthlessvandalism
uponpoolsand
trees^ Itwasan
offence againstNatureallthemorediscordantbecauseitwasexpressedinNature^'sterms. Thus,beforetheimpactofNaturalism
shooktraditional designinactualarchitecture,
the formalgardenwasalreadygone. Eighteenthcenturyphilo-sophers, seated under porticoes still impeccablyGreek,
were
enabled comfortablyto
venerate Nature—or, if not Nature, at least her symbol
—
^as theywatchedtheirancestralbutunromanticgardensgive
place to a
'prospect'oflittle holes and
hills. At