THE ROMANTIC
FALLACY
67
itwhereveritmightbe
found. As in the
cult of
the past, so,
too, in this cult of
the 'natural,' it
was
literature,the trueinstrument
ofthe
Romantic
Movement,thatledthe
way.
|
"Itis
evidentthatarchitecture
andthecriticismof
architecturehave reflected
thispoeticchange.
The
formal
garden, necessarily, was the first
object of
attack. IntheRenaissancetaste
thegardenwasan
extensionofthemain
design. Itwasamiddleterm
between architecture and Nature.
The transition
from house to landscape
was logically effected by
combining
at this point formality of design
with
naturalness of material.
The garden was thus an
integral, anarchitectural, elementin the art.
But
whenNature, through poetry,acquired
itsprestige,
the formal
garden
stood condemned. Unpleasing
in itself, becaiise
'
unnatural,' it wasin addition
a
barbarousviolence,aruthlessvandalism
uponpools
and
trees^ Itwas
an
offence againstNatureallthe
morediscordantbecauseitwasexpressedinNature^'s
terms. Thus,beforetheimpactofNaturalism
shook
traditional designinactualarchitecture,
the formal
gardenwasalreadygone. Eighteenthcenturyphilo-
sophers, seated under porticoes still impeccably
Greek,
were
enabled comfortablyto
venerate Nature
—or, if not Nature, at least her symbol
—
^as they
watchedtheirancestralbutunromanticgardensgive
place to a
'
prospect'
oflittle holes and
hills. At