1
1
2
2
1
1
2
‐175%
‐150%
‐125%
‐100%
‐75%
‐50%
‐25%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
Relative difference with recycling according
to the number of cases
>150
%
<‐ 150
%
>150%
<‐150%
recycling
preferred to
alternative
alternative
preferred to
recycling
Deletion of abiotic resources
Incineration with Landfill
energy recovery
Figure 6 Relative difference between the impacts from the different end-of-life options vs. recycling for depletion of aboitic resources for paper.
The size of the “bubble” is proportional to the number of cases coming up with a value within the same range as another.
23
2
2
1
‐175%
‐150%
‐125%
‐100%
‐75%
‐50%
‐25%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
Relative difference with incineration with energy recovery
according to the number of cases
>150
%
<‐ 150
%
>150%
<‐150%
incineration
with energy
recovery
preferred to
alternative
alternative
preferred to
incineration with
energy recovery
Deletion of abiotic resources
Recycling Landfill
Figure 7 Relative difference between the impacts from the different end-of-life options vs. incineration for depletion of aboitic resources for paper.
The size of the “bubble” is proportional to the number of cases coming up with a value within the same range as another.