Other indicators
Acidification
Recycling appears as the preferable option in most cases while landfill is the least preferable option. The
feedstock recycling (case 8[PS1]) appears again as an exception in that it is less advantageous than incineration.
Table 35 Ranking of end-of-life options within each scenario for acidification for plasticsCase RecyclingIncineration
with energy
recoveryLandfill Pyrolysis1[PE] +++ ++ +
1[PET] +++ ++ +
2[MIX1] +++ ++ + ++
2[MIX2] +++ ++ + ++
2[MIX3] +++ ++ + ++
2[MIX4] +++ ++ + ++
3[PE] ++ +++ +
3[PP] +++ ++ +
3[PS] +++ ++ +
3[PET] +++ ++ +
3[PVC] +++ ++ + +++ best option
8[PS1] * + * +++ ++ intermediary option
8[PS2] +++ + + worst option
8[PS3] +++ + option not assessed
Studies n°4, 5, 6 and 7 do not include this indicator
* Feedstock recycling scenarioAcidification
(kg SO2 eq)Photochemical oxidation
The majority of cases points out that recycling is the preferred option and landfill the worst option regarding this
indicator. However, in the case of PVC recycling, only assessed in case 7[PVC], landfill is preferable to recycling.
Table 36 Ranking of end-of-life options within each scenario for photochemical oxidation for plasticsCase RecyclingIncineration
with energy
recoveryLandfill Pyrolysis1[PE] +++ + ++
1[PET] +++ + ++
2[MIX1] +++ ++ + ++
2[MIX2] +++ ++ + ++
2[MIX3] +++ ++ + ++
2[MIX4] +++ ++ + ++
3[PE] ++ +++ +
3[PP] +++ ++ +
3[PS] +++ ++ +
3[PET] +++ ++ +
3[PVC] +++ ++ +
7[PET] +++ +
7[PE] +++ +
7[PVC] + +++ +++ best option
8[PS1] * ++ * ++ ++ intermediary option
8[PS2] +++ + + worst option
8[PS3] +++ + option not assessedPhotochemical
oxidation
(kg ethylene
eq)Studies n°4, 5 and 6 do not include this indicator
* Feedstock recycling scenario