1000 Solved Problems in Modern Physics

(Tina Meador) #1

10.3 Solutions 585


νμ=ν 1 cosθ+ν 2 sinθ (1)
andνe=−ν 1 sinθ+ν 2 cosθ (2)
which form a set of ortho normal states.νμandνeare the sort of states which
are produced in charged pion decay (π→μ+νμ) and neutron decay (n→
p+e−+νe); ν 1 andν 2 are the mass eigen states, corresponding to the
neutrino massesm 1 andm 2. In the matrix form
(
νμ
νe

)

=

(

cosθ sinθ
−sinθcosθ

)(

ν 1
ν 2

)

(3)

The difference in the masses leads to difference in the characteristic fre-
quencies with which the neutrinos are propagated. Hereθis known as the
mixing angle which is analogous to the Cabibbo angleθc. Using natural units
(=c=1) at timet
=0,
ν 1 (t)=ν 1 (0)e 1 −iE^1 t
ν 2 (t)=ν 2 (0)e 2 −iE^2 t (4)
where the exponentials are the usual oscillating time factors associated with
any quantum mechanical stationary state. Since the momentum is conserved
the statesν 1 (t) andν 2 (t) must have the same momentump.Ifthemass
mi<<Ei(i= 1 ,2)

Ei=(p^2 +m^2 i)^1 /^2 ∼=p+

m^2 i
2 p

(5)

Suppose att=0, we start with muon type of neutrinos so that,νμ(0)= 1
andνe(0)=0 then by (3),
ν 2 (0)=νμ(0) sinθ (6)
ν 1 (0)=νμ(0) cosθ
and νμ(t)=cosθν 1 (t)+sinθν 2 (t)(7)
Thus at timet
=0, the muon–neutrino beam is no longer pure but devel-
ops an electron neutrino component. Similarly, an electron–neutrino beam
would develop a muon–neutrino beam component.
Using (4) and (6) in (7)
νμ(t)
νμ(0)

=cos^2 θ.e−iE^1 t+sin^2 θ.e−iE^2 t

and the intensity
Iμ(t)
Iμ(0)

=





νμ(t)
νμ(0)





2
=cos^4 θ+sin^4 θ+sin^2 θcos^2 θ

[

ei(E^2 −E^1 )t+e−i(E^2 −E^1 )t

]

P(νμ→νe)= 1 −sin^22 θsin^2

[

(E 2 −E 1 )

2

t

]

(8)

wherewehaveused(cos^4 θ+sin^4 θ)=(cos^2 θ+sin^2 θ)^2 −2 cos^2 θsin^2 θ
in simplifying the above equation.
Free download pdf