13-4 RANDOMIZED COMPLETE BLOCK DESIGN 49913-25. In “The Effect of Nozzle Design on the Stability and
Performance of Turbulent Water Jets” (Fire Safety Journal,
Vol. 4, August 1981), C. Theobald describes an experiment in
which a shape measurement was determined for several differ-
ent nozzle types at different levels of jet efflux velocity.
Interest in this experiment focuses primarily on nozzle type,
and velocity is a nuisance factor. The data are as follows:Nozzle Jet Efflux Velocity (m/s)
Type 11.73 14.37 16.59 20.43 23.46 28.74
1 0.78 0.80 0.81 0.75 0.77 0.78
2 0.85 0.85 0.92 0.86 0.81 0.83
3 0.93 0.92 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.83
4 1.14 0.97 0.98 0.88 0.86 0.83
5 0.97 0.86 0.78 0.76 0.76 0.75(a) Does nozzle type affect shape measurement? Compare the
nozzles with box plots and the analysis of variance.
(b) Use Fisher’s LSD method to determine specific differ-
ences between the nozzles. Does a graph of the average
(or standard deviation) of the shape measurements versus
nozzle type assist with the conclusions?
(c) Analyze the residuals from this experiment.
13-26. In Design and Analysis of Experiments,5th edition
(John Wiley & Sons, 2001), D. C. Montgomery describes an
experiment that determined the effect of four different types
of tips in a hardness tester on the observed hardness of a
metal alloy. Four specimens of the alloy were obtained, and
each tip was tested once on each specimen, producing the
following data:
(a) Is there any difference in hardness measurements between
the tips?- 0.50
- 1
- 0.25 0 0.25 0.50
- 2
012Normal scorezjResidual value
Figure 13-10 Normal probability plot of
residuals from the randomized complete
block design.10.50- 0.5
234eijFigure 13-11 Residuals by treatment.10.50- 0.5
234eij
50.50- 0.5
eij
2 4 6yijFigure 13-12 Residuals by block. Figure 13-13 Residuals versus .yˆijEXERCISES FOR SECTION 13-4c 13 .qxd 5/8/02 9:21 PM Page 499 RK UL 6 RK UL 6:Desktop Folder:TEMP WORK:PQ220 MONT 8/5/2002:Ch 13: