Los Angeles, that adopted Fordist principles
at an early stage (see Christopherson and
Storper, 1986); and also a gendereddivision
of labour, in which the place of men was seen
to be the factory and women the home
(McDowell, 1991). jf
Suggested reading
Murray (1989).
forecast The construction of an estimated
value for an observation unit, where the obser-
vation might be for a place, region, individual
or time-period. The forecast may be generated
by several quantitativemodelsand methods
(see prediction), and the term is usually
employed for estimates applying to observa-
tions outside the group used in the model’s
calibration: it is an ‘out-of-sample’ estimate,
most likely for a future time-period, or, in
a ‘spatial forecast’, for a region not included
in the estimation process (see space__time
forecasting models). lwh
forestry Most commonly, forestry refers to
the development and application of knowledge
and practices aimed at managing forests for
human use. The word has a scientific conno-
tation befitting the evolution of specialized,
increasingly technical and professionalized
knowledge about trees and forests aimed at
their intentional manipulation, and of the par-
ticular emergence of silviculture as the science
of growing trees. As a science, forestry
emerged largely from German and French
antecedents in the sixteenth and seventeenth
centuries, from Japanese and Chinese prece-
dents in the intentional growth and manage-
ment of forests for wood, and from early-
twentieth-century Scandinavian contributions,
particularly in the areas of provenance, seed
source and the intentional cultivation of seed
stock for plantation forestry (Boyd and
Prudham, 2003). This ostensibly technical
field of knowledge, widely institutionalized
under the auspices of forestry departments
and programmes in universities and colleges,
as well as in state agencies at variousscales
from local to national, and propagated via
scientific journals, is part of what is conveyed
by the term ‘forestry’. However, several ques-
tions arise in the very invocation of this
specialized term, not least: What is a forest
(and is it merely a collection of trees)? Which
particular human uses dominate in shaping
the trajectory of forest management? These
ostensibly simple questions lead to the realiza-
tion that forests and forestry, whatever else
they are, comprise sites of struggle where
interacting and contending processes of social
and ecological reproduction are partially
constituted. For instance, the management
of forests emphasizing the reproduction of
commercially valuable tree species, resolved
primarily at the localized level of discrete
stands of forests, has been the dominant prac-
tice of scientific forestry in the European tradi-
tion (epitomized by the German notion
ofNormalbaum). This approach was widely
institutionalized in botheuropeand North
America between the mid-nineteenth and
mid-twentieth centuries, and has increasingly
been exported around the world. However,
critical examination of thisparadigmreveals
that it is hardly ecologically or socially inno-
cent, prescribing the elimination of older trees,
for instance, as well as biological organisms
whose existence depends on habitat com-
promised by conversion to plantations (e.g.
the northern spotted owl in western North
America), while at the same time privileging
commercial timber interests over competing
human values (e.g. hunting, fishing, trapping,
gathering,recreation, agriculture etc.). All
of this reinforces the need to avoid reifying
apolitical renderings of forests that would
naturalize them as non-human landscapes.
Rather, as works such as E.P. Thompson’s
Whigs and hunters (1975) demonstrates, it
was not so long ago even in English history
that forests were decidedly populated and
contested, not least by conflictingproperty
claims. Thus, as Willems-Braun (1997) more
recently argued in the context of First Nation
struggles in British Columbia, Canada, the
apparently empty lands typical of scientific
forestry representations are often sites of past
and ongoing forced removals and exclusions.
In short, despite its technical connotations and
widespread professionalization, forestry is a
complex categorical invocation of attempts to
manage complexpolitical ecologies,where
trees, humans and other organisms interact,
and where human attempts at intentional man-
agement rely on constructions of what is desir-
able and useful that can be (and are) politicized
all the way down to the level of what constitutes
a tree, and what does and ought to count as
forest cover (Robbins, 2001). sp
Suggested reading
Demeritt (2001b); Scott (1998).
foundationalism The assumption that
knowledge claims must be grounded in a
source of certainty that cannot be called into
Gregory / The Dictionary of Human Geography 9781405132879_4_F Final Proof page 261 31.3.2009 1:20pm
FOUNDATIONALISM