(seeaid). This has generated criticisms from a
range of popular organizations, governments
and economists, making the IMF somewhat of
a lightening rod for criticisms of neo-liberal-
ism, especially in the wake of the 1997 Asian
economic crisis, when many critics perceived
IMF policies to have been inappropriate
and to have exacerbated the crisis (seeanti-
globalization). In addition, because voting
rights at the IMF are allocated on the basis of
contributions, and because the US govern-
ment is the leading contributor, the IMF has
been seen by many critics as a USA-dominated
institution, pushing an agenda favoured by the
US Treasury Department (Stiglitz, 2002).jgl
Suggested reading
Holborn (1948); Kolko (1988); Payer (1974);
Stiglitz (2002).
international relations The term has two
meanings: (1) the relations between states;
and (2) the study of international politics
(where it is often abbreviated as IR).
(1) International relations are conventionally
understood as the political issues (espe-
cially foreign, defence and security pol-
icy) that take place between states and
beyond the borders of states. These ‘high
politics’ are sometimes said to be in con-
trast to the ‘low politics’ of domestic
issues. In this conception, states are
understood to be bounded and sover-
eign, unitary and rational, and the pri-
mary actors on the international stage.
World politics is thus understood as the
sum of diplomatic, economic, military
and political interactions between states
as they prioritize their national interests
and seek security by maximizing power.
This view is said to be historically valid,
traceable to thinkers such as Thucydides
and Machiavelli, and formalized in
agreements such as the 1648 Treaty of
Westphalia.
This conception of world politics as
international relations – which shares
much with classical approaches to geo-
politics – can be questioned empirically.
International trade, the global circulation
of capital and the movement of labour
involve ‘non-state’ actors (e.g. corpor-
ations, markets and migrants) and tra-
verse both ‘domestic’ and ‘foreign’
spaces, demonstrating that the varied
scales of local, national and global are
intertwined. Environmental issues, the
transmission of disease, mobile cultural
forms and fundamentalist religions are
social forces that call sovereign spaces
into question. They are developments
that can require transnational governance
that involves co-operation rather than
conflict, collective interests rather than
national priorities, and international or-
ganizations rather than military alliances.
(2) International Relations – especially when
capitalized as IR – represents the aca-
demic study of relations between states
and international politics. Although pre-
viously approached via the study of law,
history and politics, as a formal discipline
IR was established in the aftermath of the
First World War, with positions at the
University of Wales, Aberystwyth and
the London School of Economics. As a
predominantly Anglo-American enter-
prise ever since, IR has been subject to
a series of paradigmatic debates that
have pitched realists against idealists, sci-
entists against historians, and globalists
against statists. Only in the past 20 years
or so, however, have the metatheoretical
assumptions – the questions of episte-
mology and ontology – of all these con-
tending positions been subject to debate.
Drawing on developments in critical
social theory associated with theories of
discourse – which have also been behind
developments in critical geopolitics – this
intellectual ferment has seen questions of
borders, identities and the construction
of international order receive much
greater attention. Approaches derived
from constructivism (seesocial cons-
truction),feminism,marxism,polit-
ical ecologyandpost-structuralism
have taken on, but not displaced, the
realist and neo-realist mainstream in the
study of international politics. dca
Suggested reading
Baylis and Smith (2004); Burchill, Devetak,
Linklater, Paterson, Reus-Smit and True
(2001); Dalby and O ́Tuathail (1998).
Internet A vast network of interconnected
computers used to make the information,
services, data and programs stored on one
computer accessible to remote users, permit-
ting them to purchase goods, download music,
query databases, communicate messages and
so forth.
Whilst partly developed from US defence
research during the Cold War, the Internet’s
Gregory / The Dictionary of Human Geography 9781405132879_4_I Final Proof page 391 31.3.2009 7:05pm
INTERNET