Comp. by: VPugazhenthi Stage : Revises1 ChapterID: 9781405132879_4_N Date:31/
3/09 Time:15:13:07 Filepath:H:/00_Blackwell/00_3B2/Gregory-9781405132879/appln/
3B2/revises/9781405132879_4_N.3d
both the mental agility and access to in-
formation to obtain the most for the
least, and applying both to consumers
who maximize utility, and producers
who maximize profits.
(2) A concern with determining conditions
for equilibrium. Rational responses by
producers and consumers tomarketsig-
nals produce equilibrium such that there
is no incentive for any individual to
change their decision: market equilib-
rium is the solution to the problem of
individual maximization.
(3) An emphasis on defining competitive
market efficiency such that there is an
optimal allocation of resources among
competing uses. If not, there is competi-
tive market failure, requiring correction.
(4) An assertion of the methodological sov-
ereignty of independent, rational individ-
uals, and who form the back-stop of
neo-classical explanation. Everything –
institutions, firms, social classes – is redu-
cible to the law of individual rational
choice (methodological individualism).
Criticisms of neo-classical economics are
endless. They include objections that neo-
classicism is nothing but anideology, a sop
for marketcapitalism; that the rational choice
assumption is empirically false, logically in-
consistent and morally suspect; that equilib-
rium, with its assumption that time has
stopped, holds at best in Heaven and never
on Earth; thatsocietyis always more than
the sum of its rational agents (thereissuch a
thing as society); and that the use of math-
ematics is primarily for internal sociological
purposes and not for meeting scholarly ends
(even Samuelson said that his intensive know-
ledge of mathematics made him feel like an
Olympic-trained athlete with no race to run).
Neo-classical economics entered economic
geography as part of thequantitative revo-
lutionfrom the late 1950s, and also at the
same time through an allied movement,
regional science(King, 1979). The central
intellectual problem was to introducespaceto
a theoretical system that had never systemat-
ically included it. While economic geograph-
ers and regional scientists made attempts to
do so via location theory, there always
remained fundamental problems in couching
neo-classical competitive equilibrium models
within an economy distributed over space (see
space-economy), because the spatial constitu-
tion of an economy inherently confers mono-
polistic advantage. Consequently, the core
neo-classical postulate of competitive market
efficiency is violated (see (3) above). This is
yet another example of what Harvey (1985b,
p. 142) identifies as the ‘numbing effect’ of
space on the ‘central propositions ofanysocial
theory’. In any case, economic geographers
were never as mathematically astute as neo-
classical economists, nor did most of them
share their penchant forabstractionand rig-
our. Consequently, the importation of neo-
classical theory was frequently half-hearted,
incomplete and prone to mistakes. From the
late 1990s, there was a second-wave attempt
to link economic geography to neo-classicism
through thenew economic geography, but
this has been even more unsuccessful as meas-
ured by the degree of disciplinary acceptance
than in the first go-around. tb
Suggested reading
Robinson (1962).
neo-geography A term – coined by a non-
geographer – referring to the bespoke creation
ofmapsusing the internet, involving the
shared use of mapping resources (such as
Google Maps and geographical informa-
tion systems) to which information is added.
Those bespoke maps can incorporate a range
of other materials to illustrate the character-
istics of individual places – such as photo-
graphs. It is seen as part of a movement that
is de-professionalizingcartographyand mak-
ing map construction feasible for a wide range
of users. Such construction can involve the
input of data from devices such asglobal
positioning systems– allowing, for example,
the real-time mapping of journeys and track-
ing of movements. rj
Suggested reading
Turner (2006). See also http://platial.com/splash
and http://neogeography.net/
Quantity
Price
Demand
Supply
neo-classical economics Supply and demand
Gregory / The Dictionary of Human Geography 9781405132879_4_N Final Proof page 496 31.3.2009 3:13pm Compositor Name: ARaju
NEO-GEOGRAPHY