Comp. by: LElumalai Stage : Revises1 ChapterID: 9781405132879_4_P Date:1/4/09
Time:15:20:55 Filepath:H:/00_Blackwell/00_3B2/Gregory-9781405132879/appln/3B2/re-
vises/9781405132879_4_P.3d
The higher the amount ofvalue-addedin the
production process relative to the costs
incurred (of labour, materials and fixed cap-
ital), the greater is the productivity. In primary
industries, however, productivity usually
implies the ratio of production per unit area
of land rather than to its (imputed) cost.
With the growth ofserviceindustries in
advancedcapitalistsocieties, attempts have
been made to measure productivity in sectors
other than manufacturing – not least in higher
education! – though the concept ofvalue
addedis not readily applied in many such
situations. rj
profit cycle A sectoral approach to under-
standing changes experienced by regional
economies, developed by economist Ann
Markusen as an alternative to theproduct
life cyclemodel. Instead of focusing on
regularities in the changing scale of output or
changes in the qualitative characteristics of a
product and its production process over time,
Markusen (1985) argued that the economic
variable most crucial to determining industrial
change is therate of profit. Drawing her inspir-
ation from both Marx and Schumpeter, she
argued that change within an industry should
be understood in terms of two central pro-
cesses, each of which is pursued by firms to
increase market power and hence profit rates:
(i)innovationand (ii) imperfect competition.
She proposed a five-stagemodel through
which industries move:
. New industries are born and core products
are being designed: a regime ofzero profits.
. Once an innovation is commercially suc-
cessful, and so long as its production is
concentrated in the hands of a single
(monopoly) firm,super profitsare likely.
. As patents expire and/or imitation and in-
novationdiffusionfacilitates entry by new
firms, the market power once held by the
monopoly firm dissipates. Profits decline
to normal profit levels as the industry
moves towards market saturation. It is
only at this stage that conditions resemble
perfect competition.
. If some firms increase their market shares
through mergers and acquisitions, this
move towards oligopoly will raise profit
rates tonormal-pluslevels. But if the indus-
try evolves along a path of predatory pri-
cing and excessive competition, profit rates
will be squeezed tonormal-minuslevels.
. Once the sector matures to obsolescence,
negative profitswill ensue.
Markusen argues that ‘distinct spatial tenden-
cies’ accompany each stage of a sector’s pas-
sage through the profit cycle (1985, p. 24) (see
table).
The approach is a suggestive one, but it was
roundly criticized by Storper (1985) for its
essentialism. While he accepted that the
modelwas one of the most effective ways to
comprehend ‘multilocational, large-scale pro-
duction systems and sectoral location patterns
over time’, he saw it as a premature formaliza-
tion and argued for a much more historically
informed analysis of the dynamics of geo-
graphicalindustrialization. msg
property Relationships between persons
with respect to the use or benefit of valued
things. Legal scholars tend to see property
rights as residing in the ‘jural relations’
between individuals, rather than in the thing
itself. If I claim a propertyrightin a thing
(such as land), what is really being asserted is
that I can exclude you from access to it
(Macpherson, 1978a). Thelawof property
concerns itself with the legally recognized dis-
tribution of rights, benefits and responsibilities
associated with the objects of property.
Variations can occur in terms of the range
of objects over which property rights are rec-
ognized, the extent of rights that are recog-
nized and the entities that can bear such
rights. These can all be construed very
broadly: for example, the objects of property
can include not only land (land tenure) and
money, but intangibles such as names, know-
ledge and shares in joint-stock companies.
Despite this diversity, Western liberal societies
(see liberalism) tend towards a strikingly
narrow view of property, summarized by
Singer (2000) as the ‘ownership model’.
Private property, the default category here, is
viewed in largely asocial terms: The owner is
assumed to hold a full bundle of property
rights (alienation, use, exclusion etc.), and is
expected to be motivated by self-regarding
behaviour. state intervention is presump-
tively suspect, and must be justified in rela-
tion to the prior and superior rights of the
Stage Profit rate regime Spatial tendency
1 Zero profits Concentration
2 Super profits Agglomeration
3 Normal profits Dispersion
4 Normal-plus or -minus profits Relocation
5 Negative Abandonment
Gregory / The Dictionary of Human Geography 9781405132879_4_P Final Proof page 593 1.4.2009 3:20pm
PROPERTY