The Dictionary of Human Geography

(nextflipdebug2) #1

Comp. by: LElumalai Stage : Revises1 ChapterID: 9781405132879_4_T Date:31/3/09
Time:21:40:51 Filepath://ppdys1108/BlackwellCup/00_Blackwell/00_3B2/Gregory-
9781405132879/appln/3B2/revises/9781405132879_4_T.3d


reassembled in new constellations. In a
parallel series of essays that centred on
the technical transformations in the cir-
culation ofmoneythat lie at the heart of
Harvey’s theses, for example, Thrift
(1997a) showed that ‘new forms of elec-
tronic detachment have produced new
forms of social involvement’: that con-
temporary processes of time–space com-
pression still depend on the intimacy of
interpersonal contact.
(3) These contributions emphasize that
time–space compression isspatially differ-
entiated. Harvey’s original account of ‘the
shrinking world’ focused on the global
northand was insensitive to the mul-
tiple and compound geographies of
time–space compression, but since then
he has provided more nuanced discus-
sions that pay closer attention to the
globalsouthand to the politico-military
carapace of contemporaryaccumulation
by dispossession(Harvey, 2003b, 2005;
cf. Agnew, 2001; seeprimitive accumu-
lation). Harvey continues to emphasize
thepolitical economyof time–space
compression, and while it is not neces-
sary to accept Massey’s (1993, p. 60)
characterization of this as an ‘econo-
mism’, time–space compression does
have other vital dimensions that are con-
nected but cannot be reduced to the
logics of capital. Late-modern war
emphasizes the enhanced power of mili-
taryviolenceover time and space, for
example, and the formation of trans-
national public spheres reveals the im-
portance of globalflowsof images and
information to the formation of net-
work societies. All of these dimensions
have their own hierarchies, margins
and exclusions – hence the crucial im-
portance ofpositionality(Sheppard,
2002) – and these variable topologies
imply that time–space compression op-
erates alongside processes oftime–space
expansion. dg

Suggested reading
Agnew (2001); Harvey (1989b, chs 15–17).

time^space convergence A decrease in the
friction of distancebetween places. As this
definition suggests, the concept originated
withinspatial science, where it was first
formulated by Douglas Janelle (1968). He
defined the convergence rate between two

locations as the average rate at which the
time needed to travel between them decreases
over time: the measure was supposed to be
‘mathematically analogous to velocity as de-
fined by the physicist’.
Janelle (1969) attributed time–space con-
vergence to technical change: ‘as a result of
transportinnovation, places approach each
other in time–space’. Janelle showed that
time–space convergence is usually discontinu-
ous in time – convergence curves are typically
jagged, corresponding to pulses of technical
innovation – and uneven overspace: ‘Any
transport improvement will tend to be of
greatest advantage to the highest-ordered
centre that it connects’ (Janelle, 1968). Forer
(1974) noted that the converse is also true –
that time–space convergence is partly a function
of the hierarchical structure of the settlement
system – so that Janelle’s model of ‘spatial
reorganization’ entailed a double movement in
which ‘places define spaces’ and spaces in turn
progressively ‘redefine’ places.
Other geographers distinguished distance-
convergencefromcost-convergenceand identified
a pervasive tendency for the friction of dis-
tance to decrease under the sign ofmodern-
ity. Since the friction of distance is a
fundamental postulate of classical central
place theory,diffusion theoryandloca-
tion theory– it is, after all, what makes the
identification of spatial patterns possible –
time–space convergence was supposed to
‘scramble’ and ‘play havoc’ with these stand-
ard geometricmodels(Falk and Abler, 1980).
Time–space convergence was thus linked to a
concept ofplastic space: ‘a space defined by
separation in time or cost terms, a space
which the progressions and regressions of
technology make one of continuous flux’
(Forer, 1978).
These were simple but suggestive ideas, yet
Forer (1978) suggested that most contempor-
ary geographers had paid little attention to
them because they addressed ‘the larger can-
vas of economic history and the long-term
development of society’. Ironically, however,
it was precisely those links that turned out to
be most important. Pred (1973) had already
provided an imaginative reconstruction of the
changing time-lags within the circulation of
public information through major newspapers
published on the eastern seaboard of the
USA between 1790 and 1840. Although his
studies mapped the geography of time–space
convergence and its hierarchical structure,
and made explicit reference to Janelle’s contri-
butions, Pred was more interested in the

Gregory / The Dictionary of Human Geography 9781405132879_4_T Final Proof page 758 31.3.2009 9:40pm Compositor Name: ARaju

TIME–SPACE CONVERGENCE
Free download pdf