Comp. by: LElumalai Stage : Revises1 ChapterID: 9781405132879_4_T Date:31/3/09
Time:21:40:52 Filepath://ppdys1108/BlackwellCup/00_Blackwell/00_3B2/Gregory-
9781405132879/appln/3B2/revises/9781405132879_4_T.3d
abstract symbols to represent roads, railways,
political boundaries and hydrographic features
such asrivers, streams andlakes (Collier, Forrest
and Pearson, 2003). Toponyms (place names
and feature names) reflect local usage as well as
government efforts to standardize spelling and
nomenclature (Monmonier, 2006). mm
Suggested reading
Forrest and Kinninment (2001).
topography The detailed study and de-
scription of aplaceas much as to the materi-
ality of its features or landforms more
generally. In recent years, topography has
been mobilized as a research method, ‘to
carry out a detailed examination of some part
of the material world, defined at anyscale
from thebodyto theglobe, in order to under-
stand its salient features and their mutual and
broader relationships’ (Katz, 2001, p. 1228).
In this sense, it has been used incritical
human geographyto delineate the social pro-
duction of localities as much as the knowledge
about them, understanding both to be the
contested outcomes of particular interests
and actors. The intent is to discern the sedi-
mented process of place-formation from the
localityitself and in so doing, situate ‘places
in their broader context and in relation to
other areas and geographic scales’, thereby
offering a means of understanding structure
and process simultaneously (Katz, 2001,
p. 1228). Just astopographic mapsconnect
sites of equal elevation through contour lines,
so too can particular relationships across lo-
calities be revealed and examined using top-
ography. That is, the trace or effects of
particular processes on various places can be
demonstrated through this methodology to
suggest their translocal bearing. This under-
standing led to the notion of ‘counter-topog-
raphies’, which are seen as a way to theorize
the connectedness of disparate places by virtue
of their relationship to a particular political–
economic or social process, such as demo-
cratic inclusion,privatizationorgentrifica-
tion. Focusing on the de-skilling of young
people, for instance, Katz (2001a) produced
a counter-topography linking New York City
and rural Sudan. The connections drawn are
analytical rather than homogenizations.
Counter-topographies are concrete abst-
ractionsthat offer a means of recognizing
the historical and geographical specificities of
particular places while also enabling the infer-
ence of their connections in relation to specific
material social practices. The intent in linking
different places analytically is to produce an
alternative geographical and political imagin-
ation that might work translocally in the name
of common interests (cf. Pratt, 2004; alsocon-
trapuntal geographies). Thegeographical
imaginationassociated with topography as a
method and the political possibilities of coun-
ter-topographies as concrete abstractions have
been best realized byfeminist geographers.
Looking at political transformation in Mexico,
Lise Nelson (2004) drew out a topographical
analysis to examine the historical experiences
of rural women engaging in regional and even
national commerce, and the ways in which
their engagements led to reconfigurations of
their subjectivities along with the contours of
their political practices. Her work demon-
strates how ‘the shifting norms and practices
ofgenderandcitizenship’ in a single place
both propel and are propelled by changing
local–global dynamics. Telling far ‘more than
a ‘‘local’’ story’, the renegotiations ofsubject-
ivityreveal as they alter the social relations of
poweranddifferenceacross scale (Nelson,
2004, pp. 180–2). Pratt and Yeoh (2003)
use topography as a means of examining
transnationalism with greater specificity
and attentiveness to difference. Revealing the
‘multistranded connections transnational sub-
jects make’ as they move acrossspaceand
scale, they develop the notion of ‘comparative
transnationalisms’, and theorize their diverse
but interconnected manifestations on the
ground (Pratt and Yeoh, 2003, p. 164). ck
Suggested reading
Katz (2001); Nagar and Swarr (2005).
topology A field of mathematics studying
the spatial properties of an object or network
that remain true when that object is stretched.
These include connectivity and adjacency.
Imagine stretching a rubber band between
two fingers. Likening the band to avector
line segment, then the start node (the one
end) remains connected to the other despite
the stretching. Treating the band as a polygon,
the one side remains to the left of the other
throughout. Topological encoding is useful in
GIS for error trapping and spatial queries.
networksmay be represented as graphs and
analysed usinggraph theory. rh
Suggested reading
Wise (2002).
topophilia A term coined by geographer
Yi-Fu Tuan (1974, p. 4) to describe the
Gregory / The Dictionary of Human Geography 9781405132879_4_T Final Proof page 762 31.3.2009 9:40pm Compositor Name: ARaju
TOPOGRAPHY