Handbook of Psychology, Volume 4: Experimental Psychology

(Axel Boer) #1

116 Foundations of Visual Perception


obtained in the one-parameter Bayesian local grouping func-
tion (r=.89).
In the conclusion of this section, we wish to emphasize the
profound theoretical repercussions of the kind of analysis un-
dertaken by Geisler et al. (2001). These authors looked for a
foundation of the principles of perceptual organization in
the statistics of the natural world and discovered a covaria-
tional structure in these statistics. Furthermore, Geisler et al.
showed that under minimal assumptions, the regularities of
environment can predict human performance in simple per-
ceptual tasks. The findings of Geisler et al. imply that optical
stimulation does contain information for perception, in con-
trast to the view held by the Gestaltists. The information is
available for perceptual systems to develop the correspond-
ing sensitivities and to match the perceptual capacities of the
organism to the structure of the environment.
As Geisler et al. (2001) pointed out, the rapidly growing re-
search in neural networks shows that self-organizing networks
(such as in Kohonen, 1997) are sensitive to the covariational
structure of their inputs. This suggests that self-organizing
neural networks could provide a useful tool in guiding our
search for the match between the perceptual capacities of
the biological organisms and the statistical structure of their
environments.


REFERENCES


Agresti, A. (1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis.
New York: Wiley.
Attneave, F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual percep-
tion.Psychological Review, 61,183–193.
Attneave, F. (1959). Applications of information theory to psychol-
ogy: A summary of basic concepts.New York: Holt, Rinehart and
Winston.
Baird, J. C., & Noma, E. (1978). Fundamentals of scaling and
psychophysics.New York: Wiley.
Barlow, H. (2001). Redundancy reduction revisited. Network: Com-
putation in Neural Systems, 12,241–253.
Barlow, H. (in press). The exploitation of regularities in the envi-
ronment by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Science.
Barlow, H. B. (1972). Single units and sensation: A neuron doctrine
for perceptual psychology? Perception, 1,371–394.
Barlow, H. B. (1995). The neuron doctrine in perception. In M. S.
Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences(pp. 415–435).
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Barraza, J. F., & Colombo, E. M. (2001). The time course of the
lower threshold of motion during rapid events of adaptation.
Vision Research, 41,1139–1144.
Barrow, H. G., & Tenenbaum, J. M. (1986). Computational ap-
proaches to vision. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas


(Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 2.
Cognitive processes and performance(pp. 38-1–38-70). New
York: Wiley.
Berkeley, G. (2000). An essay towards a new theory of vision. In
A. C. Fraser (Ed.),The works of George Berkeley.Bristol, UK:
Thoemmes Press. Retrieved August 18, 2001, from http://
psychclassics.yorku.ca/Berkeley/vision.htm, 4th ed., 1732. (Orig-
inal work published 1709)
Boring, E. G. (1917). A chart of the psychometric function.
American Journal of Psychology, 28,465–470.
Britten, K. H., Shadlen, M. N., Newsome, W. T., & Movshon, J. A.
(1992). The analysis of visual motion: A comparison of neuronal
and psychophysical performance. Journal of Neuroscience, 12,
4745–4765.
Bruce, V., Green, P. R., & Georgeson, M. A. (1996). Visual per-
ception: Physiology, psychology, ecology(3rd ed.). Hove, UK:
Erlbaum.
Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological
Review, 64,123–152.
Brunswik, E. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (International Encyclope-
dia of Unified Science: Foundations of the Unity of Science,
Vol. 1, No. 10)
Brunswik, E., & Kamiya, J. (1953). Ecological cue-validity of
“proximity” and other Gestalt factors. American Journal of
Psychology, 66,20–32.
Bush, R. R. (1963). Estimation and evaluation. In R. D. Luce, R. R.
Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychol-
ogy(Vol. 1, pp. 429–469). New York: Wiley.
Cook, R. G., & Wixted, J. T. (1997). Same-different texture
discrimination in pigeons: Testing competing models of discrim-
ination and stimulus integration. Journal of Experimental Psy-
chology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23,401–416.
Dretske, F. (1986). Knowledge and the flow of information.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Egan, J. P. (1975). Signal detection theory and ROC analysis.New
York: Academic Press.
Ellis, W. D. (Ed.). (1936). A source book of Gestalt psychology.
London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Eng, J. (2001, February 11).Roc curve fitting.Retrieved August 14,
2001, from http://www.rad.jhmi.edu/jeng/javarad/roc/ JROCFITi.
html.
Epstein, W. (1988). Has the time come to rehabilitate gestalt theory?
Psychological Research, 50,2–6.
Epstein, W. (1993). The representational framework in perceptual
theory.Perception & Psychophysics, 53,704–709.
Epstein, W., & Hatfield, G. (1994). Gestalt psychology and the
philosophy of mind. Philosophical Psychology, 7,163–181.
Fechner, G. T. (1996). Elements of psychophysics(H. E. Adler,
Trans.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. (Original work
published 1860)
Free download pdf