References 349Heuer, H. (1983). Bewegungslernen[Motor learning]. Stuttgart,
Germany: Kohlhammer.
Heuer, H. (1989). Movement strategies as points on equal-outcome
curves.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12,220–221.
Heuer, H. (1990). Rapid responses with the left or right hand:
Response-response compatibility effects due to intermanual
interactions. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-
response compatibility: An integrated perspective(pp. 311–
342). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Heuer, H. (1991). Invariant relative timing in motor-program theory.
In J. Fagard & P. H. Wolff (Eds.), The development of timing
control and temporal organization in coordinated action: Invari-
ant relative timing, rhythms, and coordination(pp. 37–68).
Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Heuer, H. (1993a). Estimates of time to contact based on changing
size and changing target vergence. Perception, 22,549–563.
Heuer, H. (1993b). Structural constraints on bimanual movements.
Psychological Research, 55,83–98.
Heuer, H. (1995). Models for response-response compatibility: The
effects of the relation between responses in a choice task. Acta
Psychologica, 90,315–332.
Heuer, H. (1998). Blocking in rapid finger tapping: The role of
variability in proximo-distal coordination. Journal of Motor
Behavior, 30,130–142.
Heuer, H., Kleinsorge, T., Spijkers, W., & Steglich, C. (2001). Static
and phasic cross-talk effects in discrete bimanual reversal move-
ments.Journal of Motor Behavior, 33,67–85.
Heuer, H., & Sangals, J. (1998). Task-dependent mixtures of coor-
dinate systems in visuomotor transformations. Experimental
Brain Research, 119,224–236.
Heuer, H., & Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Transfer of learning among
motor patterns with different relative timing. Journal of Experi-
mental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14,
241–252.
Heuer, H., Schmidt, R. A., & Ghodsian, D. (1995). Generalized
motor programs for rapid bimanual tasks: A two-level
multiplicative-rate model. Biological Cybernetics, 73,343–356.
Heuer, H., Spijkers, W., Kleinsorge, T., & Steglich, C. (2000).
Parametrische Kopplung bei Folgen beidhändiger Umkehrbewe-
gungen mit gleichen und unterschiedlichen Weiten [Parametric
coupling in sequences of bimanual reversal movements with
same and different amplitudes]. Zeitschrift für experimentelle
Psychologie, 47,34–49.
Heuer, H., Spijkers, W., Kleinsorge, T., & van der Loo, H. (1998a).
Period duration of physical and imaginary movement sequences
affects contralateral amplitude modulation. Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 51A,755–779.
Heuer, H., Spijkers, W., Kleinsorge, T., van der Loo, H., & Steglich,
C. (1998b). The time course of cross-talk during the simultane-
ous specification of bimanual movement amplitudes. Experi-
mental Brain Research, 118,381–392.
Hollerbach, J. M., & Atkeson, C. G. (1987). Deducing planning
variables from experimental arm trajectories: Pitfalls and possi-
bilities.Biological Cybernetics, 56,279–292.
Holst, E. von (1939). Die relative Koordination als Phänomen und
als Methode zentralnervöser Funktionsanalyse [Relative coordi-
nation as phenomenon and as a method for the functional analy-
sis of the central nervous system]. Ergebnisse der Physiologie,
42,228–306.
Howard, I. P. (1968). Displacing the optical array. In S. J. Freedman
(Ed.), The neuropsychology of spatially oriented behavior
(pp. 19–36). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
Ibbotson, N. R., & Morton, J. (1981). Rhythm and dominance. Cog-
nition, 9,125–138.
Jagacinski, R. J., Marshburn, E., Klapp, S. T., & Jones, M. R.
(1988). Tests of parallel versus integrated structure in polyrhyth-
mic tapping. Journal of Motor Behavior, 20,416–442.
James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover.
(Original work published 1890)
Jeannerod, M. (1984). The timing of natural prehension movements.
Journal of Motor Behavior, 16,235–254.
Johansson, R. S. (1996). Sensory and memory information in the
control of dexterous manipulation. In F. Lacquaniti & P. Viviani
(Eds.), Neural bases of motor behaviour (pp. 205–260).
Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Jordan, M. I. (1996). Computational aspects of motor control and
motor learning. In H. Heuer & S. W. Keele (Eds.),Handbook of
perception and action: Vol. 2. Motor skills(pp. 71–120). London:
Academic Press.
Jung, R., & Fach, C. (1984). Spiegelschrift und Umkehrschrift bei
Linkshändern und Rechtshändern: Ein Beitrag zum Balkentrans-
fer und Umkehrlernen [Mirrorscript and invalid script in left-
handers and righthanders: A contribution to colossal transfer and
learned inversion]. In L. Spillmann & B. R. Wooten (Eds.), Sen-
sory experience, adaptation, and perception: Festschrift for Ivo
Kohler(pp. 377–399). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kalveram, K.-T. (1991). Pattern generating and reflex-like pro-
cesses controlling aiming movements in the presence of inertia,
damping and gravity. Biological Cybernetics, 64,413–419.
Kay, B. A., Kelso, J. A. S., Saltzman, E., & Schöner, G. (1987).
Space-time behavior of single and bimanual rhythmical move-
ments: Data and limit cycle model. Journal of Experimental Psy-
chology: Human Perception and Performance, 13,178–192.
Keele, S. W. (1968). Movement control in skilled motor perfor-
mance.Psychological Bulletin, 70,387–403.
Keele, S. W. (1986). Motor control. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, &
J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and performance:
Vol. 2. Cognitive processes and performance(pp. 30-1–30-60).
New York: Wiley.
Keele, S. W., & Posner, M. I. (1968). Processing of visual feedback
in rapid movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77,
155–158.