352 Motor Control
Prinz, W. (1992). Why don’t we perceive our brain states? European
Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4,1–20.
Rack, P. M. H., & Westbury, D. R. (1969). The effects of length and
stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle.
Journal of Physiology, 204,443–460.
Rinkenauer, G., Ulrich, R., & Wing, A. (2001). Brief bimanual force
phases: Correlations between the hands in force and time. Jour-
nal of Experimental Psychology: General,Human Perception
and Performance, 27,1485–1497.
Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specifica-
tion of arm, direction, and extent. Journal of Experimental Psy-
chology: General, 109,444–474.
Rosenbaum, D. A. (1983). The movement precuing technique:
Assumptions, applications, and extensions. In R. A. Magill (Ed.),
Memory and control of action(pp. 231–274). Amsterdam: North-
Holland.
Rosenbaum, D. A., & Jorgensen, M. J. (1992). Planning macro-
scopic aspects of manual control. Human Movement Science, 11,
61–69.
Rosenbaum, D. A., & Krist, H. (1996). Antecedents of action. In
H. Heuer & S. W. Keele (Eds.), Handbook of perception and
action: Vol. 2. Motor skills(pp. 3–69). London: Academic Press.
Rosenbaum, D. A., Loukopoulos, L. D., Meulenbroek, R. G. J.,
Vaughan, J., & Engelbrecht, S. E. (1995). Planning reaches by
evaluating stored postures. Psychological Review, 102,28–67.
Rosenbaum, D. A., Slotta, J. D., Vaughan, J., & Plamondon, R.
(1991). Optimal movement selection. Psychological Science, 2,
86–91.
Rosenbaum, D. A., Vaughan, J., Barnes, H. J., & Jorgensen, M. J.
(1992). Time course of movement planning: Selection of hand-
grips for object manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychol-
ogy: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18,1058–1073.
Roth, K. (1988). Investigations on the basis of the generalized motor
programme hypothesis. In O. G. Meijer & K. Roth (Eds.),
Complex movement behaviour: “The” motor-action controversy
(pp. 261–288). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Ruitenbeek, J. C. (1984). Invariants in loaded goal directed move-
ments.Biological Cybernetics, 51,11–20.
Saltzman, E., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1987). Skilled actions: A task-
dynamic approach. Psychological Review, 94,84–106.
Sangals, J. (1997). Der Einfluß der Bewegungsrückmeldung auf das
Erlernen nichtlinearer Werkzeugtransformationen [The effect of
movement feedback on the learning of nonlinear transforma-
tions].Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Philipps-Universitat,
Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Sangals, J., Heuer, H., Manzey, D., & Lorenz, B. (1999). Changed
visuomotor transformations during and after prolonged micro-
gravity. Experimental Brain Research, 129,378–390.
Savelsbergh, G. J. P., Whiting, H. T. A., & Bootsma, R. J. (1991).
Grasping tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance, 17,315–322.
Schiff, W., & Detwiler, M. L. (1979). Information used in judging
impending collision. Perception, 8,647–658.
Schmidt, R. A. (1972). The Index of Preprogramming (IP): A statis-
tical method for evaluating the role of feedback in simple move-
ments.Psychonomic Science, 27,83–85.
Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill
learning.Psychological Review, 82,225–260.
Schmidt, R. A. (1980). On the theoretical status of time in motor-
program representations. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.),
Tutorials in motor behavior(pp. 145–165). Amsterdam: North-
Holland.
Schmidt, R. A. (1985). The search for invariance in skilled move-
ment behavior. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 56,
188–200.
Schmidt, R. A. (1989). Unintended acceleration: A review of human
factors contributions. Human Factors, 31,345–364.
Schmidt, R. A., & McGown, C. (1980). Terminal accuracy of unex-
pectedly loaded rapid movements: Evidence for a mass-spring
mechanism in programming. Journal of Motor Behavior, 12,
149–161.
Schmidt, R. A., & Russell, D. G. (1972). Movement velocity and
movement time as determinants of degree of preprogramming in
simple movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 96,
315–320.
Schmidt, R. A., Sherwood, D. E., Zelaznik, H. N., & Leikind, B. J.
(1985). Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in motor behavior: Theories of
impulse variability. In H. Heuer, U. Kleinbeck, & K.-H. Schmidt
(Eds.),Motor behavior: Programming, control, and acquisition
(pp. 79–123). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H. N., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S., & Quinn,
J. T. (1979). Motor-output variability: A theory for the accuracy
of rapid motor acts. Psychological Review, 86,415–451.
Schöner, G. (1994). From interlimb coordination to trajectory
formation: Common dynamical principles. In S. P. Swinnen,
H. Heuer, J. Massion, & P. Casaer (Eds.), Interlimb coordina-
tion. Neural, dynamical, and cognitive constraints(pp. 339–
368). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Schöner, G., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1988). A synergetic theory of
environmentally-specified and learned patterns of movement co-
ordination. I: Relative phase dynamics. Biological Cybernetics,
58,71–80.
Schott, G. D., & Wyke, M. A. (1981). Congenital mirror move-
ments.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry, 44,
586–599.
Schouten, J. F., & Becker, J. A. M. (1967). Reaction time and accu-
racy. Acta Psychologica, 27,143–153.
Serrien, D. J., Bogaerts, H., Suy, E., & Swinnen, S.P. (1999). The
identification of coordination constraints across planes of mo-
tion.Experimental Brain Research, 128,250–255.
Shadmehr, R., & Brashers-Krug, T. (1997). Functional stages in the
formation of human long-term motor memory. Journal of Neu-
roscience, 17,409–419.