References 31M. Velmans (Ed.), Investigating phenomenal consciousness:
New methodologies and maps: Vol. 13. Advances in conscious-
ness research (pp. 33–65). Amsterdam, The Netherlands:
Benjamins.
Shevrin, H., & Luborsky, L. (1961). The rebus technique: A method
for studying primary-process transformations of briefly exposed
pictures.Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 133, 479–488.
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic
human information processing: Vol. 2. Perceptual learning, auto-
matic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84,
127–190.
Silverman, L. H. (1983). The subliminal psychodynamic method:
Overview and comprehensive listing of studies. In J. Masling
(Ed.), Empirical studies of psychoanalytic theory (Vol. 1).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Singer, W. (1996). Neuronal synchronization: A solution to the
binding problem? In R. Llinás & P. S. Churchland (Eds.), The
mind-brain continuum: Sensory processes. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Singer, W. (2001). Consciousness and the binding problem. Annals
of the New York Academy of Sciences, 123–146.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reac-
tions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming
by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychol-
ogy: Human Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571–590.
Tononi, G., & Edelman, G. M. (1998). Consciousness and complex-
ity. Science, 282(5395), 1846–1851.
Treisman, A. M. (1964). Selective attention in man. British Medical
Bulletin, 20, 12–16.
Treisman, A. M., & Kanwisher, N. G. (1998). Perceiving visually
presented objects: Recognition, awareness, and modularity.
Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 8(2), 218–226.
Treisman, A., & Geffen, G. (1967). Selective attention: Perception
or response? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19,
1–17.
Wardlaw, K. A., & Kroll, N. E. (1976). Autonomic responses to
shock-associated words in a nonattended message: A failure to
replicate.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Percep-
tion & Performance, 2, 357–360.
Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviourist views it. Psy-
chological Review. 20,158–177.
Watson, J. B. (1925). Behaviorism. New York: People’s Institute.
Watson, J. B. (1994). Psychology as the behaviourist views it. Psy-
chological Review. 101,248–253.
Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psycho-
logical Review, 101, 34–52.
Weinberger, J. (1992). Validating and demystifying subliminal
psychodynamic activation. In R. F. Bornstein & T. S. Pittman
(Eds.), Perception without awareness: Cognitive, clinical,
and social perspectives(pp. 170–188). New York: Guilford
Press.
Weiskrantz, L. (1990). The Ferrier lecture, 1989. Outlooks for blind-
sight: Explicit methodologies for implicit processes. Proc R Soc
Lond B Biol Sci, 239(1296), 247–278.
Weiskrantz, L. (1998). Pupillary responses with and without
awareness in blindsight. Consciousness and Cognition: An
International Journal, 7(3), 324–326.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations(G. E. M.
Anscombe, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.
Wong, P. S., Bernat, E., Bunce, S., & Shevrin, H. (1997). Brain
indices of nonconscious associative learning. Consciousness &
Cognition: An International Journal, 6, 519–544.
Wood, N. L., & Cowan, N. (1995a). The cocktail party phenomenon
revisited: Attention and memory in the classic selective listening
procedure of Cherry (1953). Journal of Experimental Psychol-
ogy: General, 124, 243–262.
Wood, N. L., & Cowan, N. (1995b). The cocktail party phenomenon
revisited: How frequent are attention shifts to one’s name in an
irrelevant auditory channel? Journal of Experimental Psychol-
ogy: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 255–260.
Wright, J. M. Von, Anderson, K., & Stenman, U. (1975). Generali-
sation of conditioned GSR’s in dichotic listening. In P. M. A.
Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 5).
New York: Academic Press.