574 Reading
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). More words but still
no lexicon: Reply to Besner et al. (1990). Psychological Review,
97,447–452
Sereno, S. C., Pacht, J. M., & Rayner, K. (1992). The effect of
meaning frequency on processing lexically ambiguous words:
Evidence from eye fixations. Psychological Science, 3,296–300.
Sereno, S. C., & Rayner, K. (2000). Spelling-sound regularity ef-
fects on eye fixations in reading. Perception & Psychophysics,
62 (2), 402–409.
Slowiaczek, M. L., & Clifton, C., (1980). Subvocalization and read-
ing for meaning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behav-
ior, 19,573–582.
Smith, F., Lott, D., & Cronnell, B. (1969). The effect of type size
and case alternation on word identification. American Journal of
Psychology, 82,248–253.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1979). Mechanisms of sentence
context effects in reading: Automatic activation and conscious
attention.Memory & Cognition, 7,77–85.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1983). On priming by a sentence
context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112,
1–36.
Starr, M. S., & Fleming, K. K. (2001). A rose by any other name is
not the same: The role of orthographic knowledge in homophone
confusion errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learn-
ing, Memory, and Cognition, 27,744–760.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reac-
tions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18,643–662.
Stone, G. O., & Van Orden, G. (1994). Building a resonance frame-
work for word recognition using design and system principles.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 20,1248–1268.
Thibadeau, R., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1982). A model of the
time course and content of human reading. Cognitive Science, 6,
101–155.
Tulving, E., & Gold, C. (1963). Stimulus information and contex-
tual information as determinants of tachistoscopic recognition of
words.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66,319–327.
Underwood, G. (1985). Eye movements during the comprehen-
sion of written language. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in
the psychology of language (Vol. 2, pp. 45–71). London:
Erlbaum.
Underwood, N. R., & McConkie, G. W. (1985). Perceptual span for
letter distinctions during reading. Reading Research Quarterly,
20,153–162.
Uhr, L. (1963). “Pattern recognition” computers as models for form
perception.Psychological Bulletin, 60,40–73
Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A rows is a rose: Spelling, sound, and
reading.Memory & Cognition, 15,181–198.
Van Orden, G. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of
form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of
printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance, 20,1269–1291.
Van Orden, G. C., Johnston, J. C., & Hale, B. L. (1988). Word iden-
tification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 14,371–386.
Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (1990). Word
identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psy-
cholinguistics.Psychological Review, 97,488–522.
Vitu, F. (1991). The influence of parafoveal processing and linguis-
tic context on the optimal landing position effect. Perception &
Psychophysics, 50,58–75.
Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Processes in word recognition. Cognitive
Psychology, 1,59–85.
Wolverton, G. S., & Zola, D. (1983). The temporal characteristics of
visual information extraction during reading. In K. Rayner (Ed.),
Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes
(pp. 41–52). New York: Academic Press.