the times | Monday February 21 2022 2GM 13
News
Stars such as Victoria Wood and
Bernard Manning would regard cancel
culture as far less restrictive than the
taboos they were forced to work
around, Russell Kane, the television
presenter and comedian, has claimed.
Kane said he had little sympathy for
present comics’ worries because the
dangers of offending now were less
than in the past. Modern stand-ups
worked in a more relaxed era, he said,
and simply needed to be smart enough
to judge the changes in sensitivities that
have led to a move from older people
being offended to younger
generations.
Kane, a novelist and
former Edinburgh
Comedy Awards winner,
said that comedians
today could joke about
sex and could use
swearing — as seen in
shows such as After Life,
The Inbetweeners, Sex
Education and even chat
shows. He said they had
less to complain about,
though he did not
adhere to the view of
those comedians who
feel that any subject is
fair game, regardless of
what offence it may cause.
“I don’t believe it’s more
difficult to be a comedian
now, speech-wise, than it
was,” Kane said. “If we
were sat with Bernard
Manning, Jimmy Jones,
Victoria Wood, about to
do a gala in the 1970s,
the list of shit you
couldn’t say was much,
much longer. I mean any-
thing to do with any sex, any
swearing — imagine not being
able to use a swear word to emphasise.
“Yes there’s different things that you
can be cancelled for, but they just
replaced the other things that were
much more difficult in the past.”
Kane said that when he first toured in
2009 his comedy would contain
obscenities “mixed with intelligent
stuff” and the people who would walk
out were “always silver hair”, muttering
“I’m sorry it’s not you, young man,
Cancel culture?
At least we can
joke about sex,
says comedian
you’re very nice on TV, but my wife, it’s
a little bit coarse, we’re going to have to
leave”. But in a total turnaround, he
said, “now all the people with silver hair,
they’re the people who first watched
alternative comedy, they’re people in
their seventies, eighties crying with
laughter the ruder it gets.
“People walking out, people aged 15
to 21, who are triggered or hurt — ‘oh
my god, it’s so controversial’.
“So it’s not that it’s more difficult, it’s
public speech where you’re trying to be
provocative has always been difficult.
It’s just difficult in a different way.”
Kane said he did not consider that
any topic was fair game. “The
rule I follow is if everyone’s
put their hand in their
pocket for 20 to 50 quid to
come and see me, and
someone leaves and
they’re upset and
they’re crying in their
car, who am I to have
done that to that person?
“But that’s the working-
class ethic come through.
That’s the only reason I
would never punch
down, not because of
some lefty Guardianista
moral thing.
“If there’s a couple
from Nigeria in the front
row and I do some
horrible joke making fun
of British Nigerians and
they’re crying in their car,
I feel like I’ve failed in my
job, which was for them
who spent their money
— maybe they booked a
hotel and had some
dinner — my job is to
make them laugh, not to
be so edgy someone leaves
crying.”
Geoff Northcott, the comedian
on whose podcast Kane was speaking,
said: “I think there should be that people
have a pop at you and you apologise.”
Kane, who chose “The Life and Novels
of Evelyn Waugh” as his specialist sub-
ject on Celebrity Mastermind, has not
escaped controversy entirely himself.
In 2010, while on the Australian
television show Good News Week, he
made a joke centred on autistic children,
prompting an apology from the net-
work and criticism from the parlia-
mentary secretary for disabilities.
Language police are crushing creativity,
Trevor Phillips, page 26
Ross Kaniuk
JONATHAN WILKINSON/DAVID HOCKNEY
D
avid Hockney
has cemented
his status as
the elder
statesman of
the British art world with
a new self-portrait and
exhibition placing his
works in “provocation”
with the masters of
previous generations
(David Sanderson writes).
Numerous works by the
artist, including the self-
portrait completed in
November, are to be
displayed in Cambridge at
the Fitzwilliam Museum
and the Heong Gallery in
Downing College.
The curators, including
Professor Martin Kemp
and Martin Gayford,
Hockney’s long-time
“Boswell”, are due to
place his works alongside
seminal pieces by artists
including Claude Monet,
Jan Brueghel the Elder
and Camille Pissarro.
The exhibition, which
will open at the two
locations in March,
delves into Hockney’s
explorations of
perspective and space, as
well as his decade-long
preoccupation with
digital art.
Despite his declining
physical state — he has
severe hearing
impairment — Hockney,
84, has continued to be
productive. The
Yorkshire-born artist
spent the first lockdown
in 2020 in a Normandy
farmhouse and created a
series of images
capturing spring on his
iPad. More than 100 were
shown in an acclaimed
exhibition at the Royal
Academy last year.
In 2017 Tate Britain
held a retrospective of his
career, pointing out that
he “continues to change
his style and ways of
working, embracing new
technologies as he goes”.
The new exhibition will
bring together works not
previously exhibited in
Britain. They include
those from his time as a
student at the Royal
College of Art in
the 1950s, his
renowned (and
very expensive)
paintings made in
the United
States in
the 1960s
and 1970s,
collages
and
digital
drawing.
It also
will show
his fascination with the
use of optical tools by
artists before the advent
of photography. After a
visit to an exhibition on
the painter Jean-Auguste-
Dominique Ingres at the
National Gallery in 1999,
Hockney began
experimenting with a
camera lucida. A
selection of drawings he
made using the device,
including of Sir Ian
McKellen and Damien
Hirst, will be displayed.
Hockney’s drawings,
paintings and digital art
will be shown “in a
series of provocative
encounters with historic
works”. The curators
hope this will
demonstrate
“how Hockney
both respects
and diverges
from tradition
and
Renaissance
ideas of
perspectival
space”.
Hockney takes his
place among greats
David Hockney’s
new self-portrait
will be among
the works in
the exhibition
g
nd
x
yp
rule I
put
poc
co
so
th
th
ca
do
“B
e
do
so
m
fr
row
hh
hat
ad
class
That
wo
d
,
y-
any
t being
to emphasise
jo
w
—
h
din
ma
bbbbe so
crying
Geoff No
onwhose podca
e
an
t
hor
ofB
they
I fe
j
How farmers made money in Roman Britain (possibly illegally)
An ancient mausoleum that was host to
the largest illegal silversmithing site in
Roman Britain has been discovered.
Archaeologists found a large amount
of litharge, a lead oxide and by-product
of silver extraction, suggesting efforts
had been made there to obtain the
precious metal.
The 15 kilos of litharge discovered at
Grange Farm, in Gillingham, Kent, is
the largest find ever at a site from the
period. A 15-year research project
began excavations there in 2005 and
2006, before the land was developed for
housing.
The earliest evidence for occupation
at Grange Farm dates to the late Iron
Age, about 100BC, before the site grew
into a small Roman rural settlement in
the late 1st century AD, evolving until it
was abandoned in the 5th century.
Metal extraction took place at one
end of a building, with fireplaces in the
middle and evidence of domestic use at
the other end. Researchers think it like-
ly a large clan was farming, hunting,
keeping animals and metal working.
A gold and silver economy operated
in the middle of the Roman period and
was tied to imperial taxation, leading
investigators to believe the silversmith-
ing may have been illicit.
Dr James Gerrard, senior lecturer in
Roman archaeology at Newcastle Uni-
versity, said: “Was that legal? Quite why
people were refining silver from silver-
rich base metal alloys is a mystery.
Quite what the objects being melted
down were is a mystery too. We might
expect that the refining of silver here
was either being done officially by the
Roman state, or perhaps illicitly. It’s an
unusual aspect to the site.”
The investigators also discovered a
monument, which would have stood at
almost the height of a two-storey
house, proving that the occupant was of
very high-status. In the lead coffin,
investigators found a middle-aged to
elderly woman, who may have been a
leader or chief of the clan.
Dr Gerrard said: “The silver suggests
wealth. The mausoleum is wealth. It
takes resources to build the structure
like the mausoleum and it takes resour-
ces to put someone in a lead coffin. She
had quite a hard life, though. She had
osteoarthritis but lived to a good age.
She was no peasant and she was some-
one with clout locally.”
Russell Kane, top, thinks it was harder
for Victoria Wood to make jokes than
modern comics such as Jimmy Carr