Islam and Modernity: Key Issues and Debates

(singke) #1
Sufi sm and ‘Popular’ Islam 147

has in fact as its explicit aim the restoration of social harmony after this has been
disturbed by disputes. There is a class of hereditary religious specialists called
dede, without whose presence the cem cannot take place and who are considered
as the chief repositories of religious knowledge. A corpus of sacred poetry, long
handed down orally (although some dede or singers kept notebooks for memory),
contains the most important religious ideas.
In the course of time, and because of the increasing penetration of the
Ottoman state, many of these communities were gradually brought into closer
conformity with ‘High Islam’. The Bektashi Sufi order, which had rituals and
esoteric doctrines that were sophisticated versions of those of village Alevis but
which was patronised by powerful members of the religious and bureaucratic
establishment (Birge 1937), appears to have been instrumental in this process.
By the beginning of the twentieth century, there were many Alevi communities



  • especially in the European part of Turkey and the western half of Asia Minor

  • in which at least some people regularly prayed, fasted during Ramadan and
    performed the hajj. Rural-to-urban migration, which began on a large scale in
    the second half of the twentieth century, initially speeded up the integration of
    individual Alevi migrants into the national mainstream. Gellner’s claim that
    modernity erodes the social foundations of ‘folk Islam’ has a particularly strong
    plausibility in the case of Alevi belief and ritual, for the cem and other rituals were
    intimately connected with the village community, and whoever left the village
    thereby gave up Alevi religious practice. Alevi identity was, moreover, a social
    stigma, so that many migrants attempted to hide their religious origins in their
    new environment. Other rural heterodox communities were affected in much
    the same way by the break-up of their isolation and their social and economic
    integration into the nation state. Individually, members of these communities
    adapted the outward behaviour of the majority, becoming practising orthodox
    Muslims in some cases or, more commonly, non-practising, ‘secular’ Muslims.
    But this is not how it ended. Several of these heterodox communities, instead
    of gradually merging into the orthodox mainstream, experienced a revival in
    the urban environment and developed ‘high’, learned forms of their beliefs and
    rituals (Olsson 1998). Most remarkably this was the case of Turkey’s Alevis,
    who, as larger numbers of them moved to the cities, often clustered together in
    compact urban neighbourhoods and, in response to discrimination, established
    voluntary associations that became the nuclei of new forms of community life.
    Efforts by the state to impose a Sunni Turkish orthodoxy through obligatory
    religious education and the appointment of religious personnel even to Alevi
    villages strengthened an awareness among the Alevis of their being different,
    and stimulated debates on what Alevism ‘really’ was. Sacred texts – the religious
    poetry and a sort of catechism that had been handed down in dede families – were
    made available to everyone in cheap printed editions. Alevi intellectuals, who
    emerged as the new, self-made authorities that largely replaced the dedes in all

Free download pdf