Principles and Practice of Pharmaceutical Medicine

(Elle) #1

entails keeping metrics of on time completion of
patient recruitment and enrollment, retention rates
of study volunteers, success rates with different
kinds of patient recruitment media and numbers of
studies completed in various therapeutic areas.
Sponsors looking to select sites for clinical trials
can use these metrics to distinguish performing
sites from nonperformers. In addition, sponsors
are increasingly using metrics to identify sites
with a higher probability of achieving trial objec-
tives on time (Anderson, 2004).
By reaching objectives, sites begin to form rela-
tionships with sponsors who recognize and
appreciate the contribution they make to the clin-
ical development of investigational compounds
and devices.


References


Anderson D. 2004.A Guide to Patient Recruitment and
Retention. Thomson CenterWatch; 10–11.
Beyster MA, Hardison DH, Lubin GM. 2005. Improv-
ing clinical trials by implementing information tech-
nology. Where will you be in three years?SAIC.
Accessed September 15, 2005, at http://www.saic.-
com/life-sciences/pdfs/mcv.pdf.
Bleicher P. 2005. Tools are just the beginning. Pharm.
Executive Suppl.16–19.
Borfitz D. 2004. International enthusiasm for EDC.
CenterWatch 11 (2).
Borfitz D. 2004. Will physicians refer their patients into
clinical trials?CenterWatch 11 (3).


Borfitz D. 2004. CRC loss tied to heavy workload.
CenterWatch 11 (7).
European Commission. 2004.Detailed Guidance on
the Application Format and Documentation to be
Submitted in an Application for an Ethics Committee
Opinion on the Clinical Trial on Medicinal Products
for Human Use, April 2004. Accessed September 16,
2005, at http://pharmacos.eudra.org/F2/pharmacos/
docs/Doc2004/april/cp%20and%20guidance%
20%20EC%20%20%20rev%2021%20April%
2004.pdf.
Gersch S, Cohen B, Hirshhorn B. 2001. The seven basic
components of clinical trials budgets.Clin. Trials
Advisor 6 (3): 5.
Hamrell MR, Wagman B. 2001. Standard operating
procedures, a beginner’s guide. Qual. Assur.
J. 5 (2): 93–97.
Information Sheets. 1998. Guidance for Institutional
Review Boards and Clinical Investigators 1998
Update, FDA Accessed September 19, 2005,
at http://www.fda.gov/oc/ohrt/irbs/operations.html#
inspections.
ISO 9000. Definitions. Accessed September 13, 2005,
at http://www.praxiom.com/iso-definition.htm.
Korieth K. 2004. Phase I spending sizzles.CenterWatch
11 (8).
Lamberti M (ed.). 2005.State of the Clinical Trials
Industry. Thomson CenterWatch; 265, 291, 292,
261, 275.
Miskin BM, Neuer A. 2002.How to Grow Your Inves-
tigative Site,a Guide to Operating and Expanding a
Successful Clinical Research Center. Thomson
CenterWatch; 39–56, 27–38, 64, 137–158.
Neuer A. 2000. Stirring up the phase I market.Center-
Watch 7 (10).

3%

7%

8%

11%

37%

F alsif ying data

Poor AE reporting

Poor drug accountability

Inf ormed consent noncompliance

Protocol violations

Figure 11.9 Top five deficiencies (2004) [Source:Thomson CenterWatch, FDA CDER, 2004]


REFERENCES 137
Free download pdf