trend for more efficient use of resources in early
clinical development.
8.1 The in vitro/in vivo prediction
The challenge is to predict systemic clearance,
volume of distribution and oral bioavailability in
humans from a combination ofin vitroandin vivo
preclinical data. If this prediction can become reli-
able, then phase I studies become more confirma-
tory. The use of human hepatocytes and isolated
enzymes can form a critical part of thein vitro
database.
Clearance of almost all drugs is by renal, meta-
bolic and/or biliary mechanisms. There are rare
exceptions, such as anesthetic gases that are
exhaled unchanged. However, in this chapter we
shall concentrate on the typical situation.
Physicochemical properties, especially lipophi-
licity, frequently govern the clearance route; lipo-
philicity is commonly measured as log D 7 : 4 , where
this variable equals log 10 ([drug in octanol]/[drug
in aqueous buffer]) at pH¼ 7 :4, in a closed system
at equilibrium. Generally, compounds with a log
D 7 : 4 value below 0 have significant renal clearance
values, whereas compounds with log D 7 : 4 values
above 0 will usually be eliminated principally by
hepatic metabolism (Smithet al., 1996). Molecular
size also has some effect on these clearance routes.
For example, compounds with molecular weights
greater than 400 Da are often eliminated through
the bile unchanged, whilst smaller lipophilic com-
pounds will generally be metabolized.
Elementary aspects of clearance
The common, clinical measurement of drug clear-
ance involves taking serial venous blood samples.
As time passes afterTmax(the time when drug
concentration reaches its peak), parent drug
concentrations continuously decline. Modeling of
drug disappearance is essentially a descriptive pro-
cess and requires actual human exposures. Unsa-
turated elimination mechanisms, in the absence of
drug sequestration, can be modeled as simple, first-
order elimination, using a constant (k) with units of
h^1 ; plasma concentration (C) is then modeled by
equations of the general form:
C¼Aekt
whereAis the concentration of drug at time (t)0
(assuming that there was instantaneous and homo-
genousequilibration ofthe dose into thecirculating
compartment). As the number of compartments
increases, then so does the number of terms of
the form shown on the right-hand side of the equa-
tion shown above.
Theelimination ratealways has units of (mass/
time) for any elimination process. For first-order
processes, the elimination rate at any one moment
is represented by a tangent to the elimination curve
for any specified timetor drug concentrationC.
In contrast, zero-order elimination processes are
occasionally encountered. These usually represent
saturation by the drug of the elimination mechan-
ism(s). These ‘drug disappearance’ curves are
straight and thus described simply by:
C¼Abt
where the elimination rate (b) does not change
with time or drug concentration. If followed for
long enough, most drugs that are subject to zero-
order elimination eventually fall to such low
Physicochemical
properties
(i) Microsomes
(ii) Hepatocytes
In vitro
rat
In vivo
rat
In vitro
human
In vivo
human
Second
mammalian
species Effect
(pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic
models)
Bioanalysis Second
mammalian
Species
Figure 8.1 General scheme showing the pharmacoki-
netic prediction pathway from physicochemical proper-
ties to human drug response viain vitroandin vivo
studies in laboratory animals
80 CH8 PHASE I: THE FIRST OPPORTUNITY FOR EXTRAPOLATION FROM ANIMAL DATA