P1: C-175-Adams
Adams WL040/Bidgoli-Vol III-Ch-29 July 11, 2003 11:50 Char Count= 0
DEVELOPING ANDMAINTAINING ASTRONGRELATIONSHIP WITHSTRATEGICALLIANCES 349Teachers would be able to have help in creating and aug-
menting their courses.
Children would have access to the most cutting-edge edu-
cation content and information in a protective Internet
environment, 24 hours a day, from any computer.
Parents would be able to communicate with their chil-
dren’s teachers to monitor their children’s progress.
Cox Communications would be the first to develop the
largest and most sophisticated ASP in the world
through a partnership with Learning Station and
others.The main problem of any project of size is to create and
maintain a system that allows and encourages, even de-
mands, constant communication efforts. Communication
works to eliminate barriers, crucial to all partnerships.
Trust also becomes a critical ingredient in the beginning
of any strategic partnership and continues to be an im-
portant issue throughout the relationship. As communi-
cation breaks down from time to time in all projects and
partnerships, success, then, depends on proceeding with
a collaborative effort of mutual respect. There must be
a spirit of resolve: that one party is not trying to outdo
the other and that everyone is important in maintaining
a good communication and effort.
In the bookGetting Partnering Right, the authors say,
“In a complex partnership there will be so many uncer-
tainties and unknowns that the path can’t be charted with
any precision.... Thetarget that a shared vision is trying
to hit is constantly moving” (Rackham et al., 1996 p. 118).
In the previously sited case of American Express and
its disaster recovery, the spirit of the company ingrained
in the employees ultimately solved the severe problems. A
resolution projection for the issues created or for the pos-
sibilities of such a tragic event had never been designed.
However, American Express as a company was able to
weather the storm by the perseverance of employees and
their commitment to the company mission.The Contract
Once the expectation and vision for a partnership has been
established, how does that evolve to a contract? InGetting
Partnering Right, reference is made to a partnership doc-
ument used by British contract specialist McGregor Cory,
in which the opening simply states that it specifically dis-
claims any legal intent:This document is not written nor entered into as
a formal or legal agreement but is only a definite
expression and record of the purpose and inten-
tion of the parties, to which they each honorably
pledge themselves. The document covers perfor-
mance criteria and sets up agreed-upon commu-
nications channels. (Rackham et al., 1996 p. 20)Perhaps business development is changing to be first
dependent upon an honor system of what is right and
just, and then building on character strengths for creat-
ing profits. Businesses and partnerships are recognizing
that profit is a result of taking the necessary, honorable
approaches.There have been many articles written on how to create
partnerships that avoid any antitrust issues. It should be
stressed that all agreements avoid any potential conflict
with regard to antitrust laws. It is important to obtain
adequate counsel and information regarding the subject,
and to make certain of all regulatory compliance issues.
The U.S. judicial branch of the U.S. government’s Web site
has helpful suggestions and recommendations regarding
this serious consideration.
The Internet, while giving greater control to the con-
sumer, has eliminated many older traditional sales pro-
cesses. The decision to buy today is based, as in the
past, on price, integrity, dependability, service, and desire.
The use of e-commerce brings instantaneous informa-
tion and cross-referencing, giving consumers, instantly,
an unparalleled amount of information and statistics they
need in order to make decisions. The slightest issue, the
smallest critical element, can make the difference in the
sale. Dynamic, growth-oriented strategic alliance partner-
ships seem to be able to focus and deliver on details that
customers search for and are demanding. These details
should be part of the contract.
The contract should discuss all key talking points and
consideration. The best contracts also require some reso-
lution points for possible conflict that might arise into the
future. Typically, the more complicated, longer contracts
seem to be those that create the greatest aggravation to
the forward purpose of the relationship. It is always ad-
visable to obtain help from a contract attorney to finalize
the document.Win/Win? Or Not?
Is there any other way? In the past, several win/lose
philosophies were invoked, perhaps not win/lose but at
least win/more win. The philosophy of winning by caus-
ing others to lose has been rampant throughout corpo-
rate America. Employees were taught in many instances
not to support each other and some felt that the only
way to obtain recognition or a promotion was to under-
mine or eliminate another’s opinion or position. Corpo-
rate executives, unsure of their own standing, have re-
moved valuable employees from their teams as employees
appeared to have talents not held by the executive. Instead
of practicing teamwork and encouraging value for contri-
butions, many employees have been taught to divide and
conquer within their own departments and, ultimately,
within the company. Secretive meetings, positioning, and
last-minute layoffs have been common during the past
decade.
Win/lose attitudes, common in many large and small
corporations, created unhealthy models for competition
or for partnering. Less than ethical personal and corpo-
rate behavior has had an enormous backlash. Employees
laid off or rearranged in new positions many times coinci-
dentally end up working together again. Former managers
have become employees of individuals the manager once
fired. Competitors purchasing formerly competing com-
panies have forced a merging of teams. It seems that in
many cases “what goes around, comes around.”
Winning through Intimidation(Ringer, 1993) suggested
that if one learns how to intimidate first, then one might
be able to avoid the pitfalls of being intimidated. It seems