1 Advances in Political Economy - Department of Political Science

(Sean Pound) #1

EDITOR’S PROOF


226 G. Serra

415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460

this paper the parallel decision of partyLwho might also be pondering whether
to choose a primary election. Such analysis is being done in a separate paper, and
here I simply assume that partyLhas already chosen a candidate by any method. In
other words,πLis taken as an exogenous parameter. In any case, remember that the
actual campaigning skills ofLandR’s candidates are revealed when they start cam-
paigning to win the election. ThusvLandvRare fully known when voters decide
whotovotefor.

4.1 Party Members Versus Party Leaders


PartyRconsists of an “elite” (or “leadership”) and a “membership” (or “rank and
file”). The elite ofRwill be referred to asRE. This leadership is policy-motivated
and has an ideal policy pointXRE, withXRE>0. The utility function ofR’s
elite is

URE(x)=−|XRE−x|

The rank and file (RAF) ofRis also policy-motivated. To simplify the analysis,
I will assume that the RAF has a median member whose preferences are decisive in
the primary election. I callRMthe median member ofRand I callXRMher ideal
point, withXRM>0. The utility function ofRMis

URM(x)=−|XRM−x|

In general, we will haveXRE=XRM, so there will be a tension between the
policy preferences of a party’s leadership and its RAF. It will be useful to mea-
sure the divergence, if any, between a party’s establishment and its primary voters.
With that purpose, I definedRas theinternal divergencein partyR, wheredR≡
|XRM−XRE|. An interesting interpretation ofdR is as thecongruence(or lack
thereof) betweenR’s elite and mass membership. Higher levels of the internal di-
vergencedRindicate a lower elite-mass congruence inside the party. Note thatdR
can take any non-negative value:dR≥0.
Parties are also responsible for formulating policy platforms to compete in the
election. More precisely, parties are in charge of indicating the policy platforms
they wish their candidates to follow in each circumstance. If partyRuses a lead-
ership selection, then its leaders formulate the policy strategies to be followed by
its candidate. If, instead, partyRuses a primary election, then its candidate will
follow the policy strategies desired by the RAF. Note that both the leadership and
the RAF think strategically. This implies that they would not passively impose their
ideal points on the candidate, but rather, they will design a strategy that maximizes
their expected utility taking into account the behavior of the rival party in the general
election.
Free download pdf