Preface
This book has its origin in notes which I compiled for a course on the history of mathematics at
King’s College London, taught for many years before we parted company. My major change in
outlook (which is responsible for its form) dates back to a day ten years ago at the University of
Warwick, when I was comparing notes on teaching with the late David Fowler. He explained his
own history of mathematics course to me; as one might expect, it was detailed, scholarly, and
encouraged students to do research of their own, particularly on the Greeks. I told him that I gave
what I hoped was a critical account of the whole history of mathematics in a series of lectures,
trying to go beyond what they would find in a textbook. David was scornful. ‘What’, he said,
‘do you mean that you stand up in front of those students andtell stories?’ I had to acknowledge
that I did.
David’s approach meant that students should be taught from the start not to accept any story at
face value, and to be interested in questions rather than narrative. It’s certainly desirable as regards
the Greeks, and it’s a good approach in general, even if it may sometimes seem too difficult and too
purist. I hope he would not be too hard on my attempts at a compromise. The aims of the book in
this, its ultimate form, are set out in the introduction; briefly, I hope to introduce students to the
history, or histories of mathematics as constructions which we make to explain the texts which we
have, and to relate them to our own ideas. Such constructions are often controversial, and always
provisional; but that is the nature of history.
The original impulse to write came from David Robinson, my collaborator on the course at King’s,
who suggested (unsuccessfully) that I should turn my course notes into a book; and providentially
from Alison Jones of the Oxford University Press, who turned up at King’s when I was at a loose
end and asked if I had a book to publish. I produced a proposal; she persuaded the press to accept
it and kept me writing. Without her constant feedback and involvement it would never have been
completed.
I am grateful to a number of friends for advice and encouragement. Jeremy Gray read an early
draft and promoted the project as a referee; the reader is indebted to him for the presence of
exercises. Geoffrey Lloyd gave expert advice on the Greeks; I am grateful for all of it, even if I only
paid attention to some. John Cairns, Felix Pirani and Gervase Fletcher read parts of the manuscript
and made helpful comments; various friends and relations, most particularly Jack Goody, John
Hope, Jessica Hines and Sam and Joe Gold Hodgkin expressed a wish to see the finished product.
Finally, I’m deeply grateful to my wife Jean who has supported the project patiently through
writing and revision. To her, and to my father Thomas who I hope would have approved, this book
is dedicated.