452 Brian K. Hall
[Serres, 1830]E. R. A. Serres. Anatomie transcendante – Quartri`eme mˆemoire: Loi de sym ́etrie
et de conjugaison du syst`eme sanguin.Ann. Sci. Nat., 21: 5–49, 1830.
[Shapiro, 2002]M. D. Shapiro. Developmental morphology of limb reduction inHemiergis
(Squamata: Scincidae): Chondrogenesis, osteogenesis, and heterochrony.J. Morphol., 254:
211–231, 2002.
[Shapiro and Carl, 2001] M. D. Shapiro and T. F. Carl. Novel features of tetrapod limb devel-
opment in two nontraditional model species: A skink and a direct-developing frog. In M. L.
Zelditch (ed.),Beyond Heterochrony. The Evolution of Development, pages 337–361. Wiley-
Liss, New York, 2001.
[Shapiroet al., 2003]M. D. Shapiro, J. Hanken, and N. Rosenthal. Developmental basis of evo-
lutionary digit loss in the Australian lizardHemiergis.J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.), 297B:
48–56, 2003.
[Shubinet al., 1995] N. Shubin, D. B. Wake, and A. J. Crawford. Morphological variation in
the limbs ofTaricha granulosa(Caudata: Salamandridae): Evolutionary and phylogenetic
implications.Evolution, 49: 874–884, 1995.
[Shubinet al., 1997] N. Shubin, C. Tabin, and S. Carroll. Fossils, genes, and the evolution of
animal limbs.Nature, 388: 639–648, 1997.
[Simpson, 1961]G. G. Simpson.Principles of Animal Taxonomy. Columbia University Press,
New York, 1961.
[Simpson, 1965]G. G. Simpson.The Meaning of Evolution. A Study of the History of Life and
of its Significance to Man. Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1965.
[Singer, 1959]C. Singer.A History of Biology to about the year 1900. A General Introduction
to the Study of Living Things. 3rd and revised edition, Abelard-Schuman, London and New
York, 1959.
[Smith, 1967]H. M. Smith. Biological similarities and homologies.Syst. Zool., 16: 101–102,
1967.
[Spemann, 1915]H. Spemann. Zur Geschichte und Kritik des Begriffs der Homologie. Die Kultur
der Gegenwar Teil III, Abt. IV.Allgemeine Biol., 1: 63–86, 1915.
[Stevens, 1984]P. S. Stevens. Homology and phylogeny: morphology and systematics.Syst.
Bot., 9: 395–409, 1984.
[Stiassny, 1986] M. L. J. Stiassny. The limits and relationships of the acanthomorph teleosts.J.
Zool. Soc. Lond. (B), 1: 411–460, 1986.
[Stiassny, 1992] M. L. J. Stiassny. Atavisms, phylogenetic character reversals, and the origin of
evolutionary novelties.Neth. J. Zool., 42: 260–276, 1992.
[Stone and Hall, 2004] J. R. Stone and B. K. Hall. Latent homologues for the neural crest as an
evolutionary novelty.Evol. & Devel, 6: 123–129, 2004.
[Striedter and Northcutt, 1991]G. F. Striedter and R. G. Northcutt. Biological hierarchies and
the concept of homology.Brain Behav. Evol., 38: 177–189, 1991.
[Struthers, 1881] J. Struthers. On the bones, articulations, and muscles of the rudimentary
hind-limb of the Greenland Right-whale (Balaena mysticetus).J. Anat. Physiol., 15: 141–
176, 302–321, 1881.
[Svensson, 2004]M. E. Svensson. Homology and homocracy revisited: gene expression patterns
and hypotheses of homology.Dev. Genes Evol., 214: 418–421, 2004.
[Szarski, 1949]H. Szarski. The concept of homology in the light of the comparative anatomy of
vertebrates.Quart. Rev. Biol., 24: 124–131, 1949.
[Teot ́onio and Rose, 2001]H. Teot ́onio and M. R. Rose. Reverse evolution.Evolution, 55: 653–
660, 2001.
[Thomson, 1966] K. S. Thomson. The evolution of the tetrapod middle ear in the rhipidistian-
tetrapod transition.Amer. Zool., 6: 379–397, 1966.
[Tintant and Devillers, 1995]H. Tintant and C. Devillers. Atavisms in present and past — its
function in evolution.Bull. Zool. France Evol. Zool., 120: 327–334, 1995.
[Valentine, 2004] J. W. Valentine.On the Origin of Phyla. The University of Chicago Press,
Chicago and London, 2004.
[Verhukst, 1996]J. Verhukst. Atavisms inHomo sapiens— a Bolkian heterodoxy revisited.
Acta Biotheor,, 44: 59–73, 1996.
[Waddington, 1939]C. H. Waddington.An Introduction to Modern Genetics. Allen and Unwin,
London, 1939.
[Wagner, 2001]G. P. Wagner (ed.).The Character Concept in Evolutionary Biology. Academic
Press, San Diego, 2001.