Anindya Banerjee and Martin Wagner 665
As in section 13.2.2.2, let:
yi=(yi,2,...,yi,T)′
ei∗=(ei∗,2,...,e∗i,T)′
F=(F 2 ,...,FT)′ ((T− 1 )×rmatrix of differenced factors
for all the units)
πi=(πi,1,...,πi,r)′ (r×1 vector of loadings of factors forith unit).
Then we may write the model (in vector notation) as:
y ̃i=fπi+zi,
wherey ̃i=yi,f=Fandzi=e∗i.
The estimated factorsfˆand their loadingsπˆiare calculated as in section 13.2.2.2,
and:
ˆzi= ̃yi−fˆπˆi; and, finally,ˆei,t=
∑t
s= 2
zˆi,s.
Since the MSB statistic is not affected by the impulse dummies, and hence by the
break fractionsγi, Bai and Carrion-i-Silvestre prove that under the null hypothesis
of a unit root and the assumption that
Tai,j
T =γiremain constant asT→∞:
MSB(i)⇒
∫ 1
0
Wi^2 (r)dr,
whereWi(r)is a standard Brownian motion independent acrossi.
The pooled statistic has the form:
Z=
√
N
MSB−0.5
1
/√
3
,
and has a limiting normal distribution, asN→∞, whereMSB=N^1
∑N
i= 1 MSBi.
The mean and variance correction terms are those appropriate for the individual
MSB(i)statistics.
A pooled Fisher-type test can also be constructed. Denoting bypithep-value of
theMSB(i)test for theith unit, then:
BCχ 2 =− 2
∑N
i= 1
logpi∼χ 22 N.
This is a result applicable to cases where the cross-section dimensionNis finite.
WhenNis large, we may also use the asymptotic approximation to the chi-squared
statistic proposed by Choi (2001), that is,
BCN=
− 2
∑N
i= 1
logpi− 2 N
√
4 N
⇒N(0, 1).