THE MAN OF AFFAIRS
dence,’ in which Proudhon dissects the conception of God as
shown in theology, and argues that the religious attitude per
petuates the contradictions within human society and serves as a
prototype for injustice. If God, or Providence, is actually respon
sible for the world as it is, Proudhon contends that he is an
influence irrevocably fatal to humanity. ‘We reach knowledge in
spite of him, we reach well-being in spite of him, we reach society
in spite of him. Every step forward is a victory in which we over
come the Divine.’
And here Proudhon issues a passionate call to liberation from
the reactionary idea of deity. ‘God is stupidity and cowardice;
God is hypocrisy and falsehood; God is tyranny and poverty; God
is evil,’ he declaims. ‘Where humanity bows before an altar,
humanity, the slave of kings and priests, will be condemned;
where any man, in the name of God, shall receive the oath of
another man, society will be founded on perjury; peace and love
will be banished from among mortals. Retreat, God, for today,
cured of your fear and become wise, I swear, with my hand
stretched out towards the heavens, that you are nothing more
than the executioner o f my reason, the spectre o f my con
science...
‘I affirm that God, if there is a God, bears no resemblance to
the effigies which the philosophers and the priests have made of
him; that he neither thinks nor acts according to the law of
analysis, foresight and progress, which is the distinctive charac
teristic of man; that, on the contrary, he seems to follow an
inverse and retrograde path; that intelligence, liberty, personality
are constituted otherwise in God than in us; and that this origin
ality of nature... makes of God a being who is essentially
anti-civilised, anti-liberal, anti-human.’
These are not the statements of an atheist, any more than
Baudelaire’s Satanism, which on occasion seems to resemble Proud
hon’s, is atheistical. Rather, we are in the presence of the, final
contradiction— God and Man. And whether we regard God as an
objective reality or as a projection of human beliefs and traditions
does riot matter a great deal. The important thing is that a prin
ciple o f evil and a principle of good appear as active and rival
entities in Proudhon’s world. This interpretation is supported by
the two extracts from his diary during the year 1846: (1) ‘God and
man neither is more than the other; they are two incomplete
martin jones
(Martin Jones)
#1