Teaching Critical Thinking in Psychology: A Handbook of Best Practices

(ff) #1

189


Beyond Standard Lectures



“I think they were a great interactive way to get personally involved in the cognitive

difficulties we were learning about in class.”


● “CogLab was easy to do and interesting because it provided concrete demonstrations


of phenomena discussed in class.”


Although a majority of students liked the CogLabs, a number also indicated that we may


have assigned too many of them or that it was too difficult to initially set up their CogLab


accounts. Our experience is that the latter issue results from students failing to read and


follow the instructions carefully, so instructors need to be prepared for such concerns.


Kershaw’s Summer 2005 class (n = 50) rated the demonstrations used in class. Two of


their favorites were the Stroop (1935) effect and a demonstration of false memory (rating =


4.4/5 for each activity). Finally, students tend to think that PRS is an effective way to


engage with some of the course material. In fact, roughly 75% of students in Pellegrino’s


classes thought that we used PRS the right amount each class period and on the right


number of days in the semester.


Conclusions and Applications to Other Courses

Actively engaging students in the process of generating data and predicting and


interpreting results is an effective way to promote critical thinking about constructs that


are often otherwise abstract. Students can complete online CogLabs prior to class or


engage in in-class activities through demonstrations or the use of the personal response


units. Students then become more engaged with the course material by actually experi-


encing the cognitive phenomena they would otherwise only read or hear about. They


gain experience in scientific reasoning by making predictions and evaluating the possible


meaning of results.


In addition to the learning benefits gained by students via these activities, instructors


benefit as well. From an instructor’s perspective, the activities are generally easy to incorporate


into the normal flow of the class, especially once one has some experience doing so. Some


materials such as the Wadsworth CogLab system or PRS units can be bundled with text-


books. Other materials, such as the in-class demonstrations, take minimal resources. We


have used these activities in cognitive psychology classes ranging from 25 to 150 students.


In addition, activities such as these are easy to implement in other courses. For instance,


Wadsworth and other publishers now offer online laboratories in many disciplines. Materials


aside, we believe the critical thinking benefit of such activities is creating an environment


conducive for students to connect personal experience with data and theory and providing


them with the opportunity to discuss and reflect on their interconnections.


Analysis of Empirical Articles and Connection to Class Content

One activity we use in our cognition courses to promote critical thinking asks students to


analyze empirical journal articles and think about how they connect to course content.

Free download pdf