Teaching Critical Thinking in Psychology: A Handbook of Best Practices

(ff) #1

Deborah S. Briihl et al.


230


This difference was statistically reliable, t(113) = 2.34, p = .021, with students registering


on average 47% more logins during the Spring term than in the Fall term.


Although the interpretation of the login data may be ambiguous, the course revision


was also associated with a significant increase in the percentage of enrolled students who


successfully completed the course (75.8% in Fall 2005; 93.2% in Spring 2006), χ


2
(1, N =


  1. = 6.64, p < .01. Online courses frequently have a serious problem with students who


fail to monitor their progress appropriately during the semester, procrastinate, and fall too


far behind to complete the course. This finding suggests that a fairly simple intervention


can produce a large improvement in successful completion of the course.


In summary, assessment of the careers course suggested that students improved their


level of skill in various components of critical thinking. Successful completion of course


modules by meeting mastery standards corroborated the students’ self-reports of increased


competence in these skills. Moreover, these improvements in academic and critical think-


ing skills were associated with increased levels of reported self-efficacy related to career


decision making.


Thinking Critically about Careers in Psychology at the Senior Level

As students prepare to graduate, they need to reflect upon what they have learned in their


undergraduate program and how it will apply to their future job choices. Students need to


choose a career that will suit them, not a career chosen on the basis of recommendations


from friends and family (such as “There are no jobs in that field so you shouldn’t do that”


or “Gee, you’re a really good listener, you should be a therapist”) or because it is the hot


trend at the moment (such as wanting to be a profiler or start a dot.com business). In order


to make a wise career choice, students need to engage in reasonable and reflective think-


ing. They must gather information about the job that interests them and do a realistic


self-assessment of their “fit” for this job. This process is more involved than just identify-


ing what they think they would like to do.


Students need to examine their thinking processes, biases, and assumptions to make the


most effective decisions. Students frequently think they have selected the appropriate


graduate program and later realize that this program was not where they wanted to be after


all. Although many people may believe that career exploration should be a project that


students should do early in their major, students should also explore career options again


at the end of their major. Students develop cognitively and gain a better understanding of


their strengths and weaknesses throughout their undergraduate careers, so it is important


to reassess job choices and skills to ensure that their initial choice is still a suitable job


choice for them. In the Senior Seminar at Valdosta State University, students develop a job


paper project over the semester.


The first part of the job paper project asks students to assess their personality, values,


and skills. In the personality section, students must select characteristics that describe


them, such as accurate, creative, empathetic, self-reliant, open-minded, organized, thorough,


and calm. In the values section, students select aspects of the job that are important to


them, such as time freedom, change and variety, public contact, helping others, independence,

Free download pdf