Publics, Politics and Participation

(Wang) #1
Kırlı 197

Notes


1.ould like to thank Shirine Hamadeh for her invaluable input. I w
2.arold Mah, “Phantasies of the Public Sphere: Rethinking the Habermas of H
Historians,” Journal of Modern History 72 (2000): 153–182.



  1. Mah, “Phantasies of the Public Sphere,” 169.
    4.eith Michael Baker, “Defining the Public Sphere in Eighteenth-Century K
    France: Variations on a Theme by Habermas,” in Habermas and the Public
    Sphere, edited by Craig Calhoun (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992),
    182–183.
    5.ürgen Habermas, J The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An
    Enquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, trans. Thomas Burger with the
    assistance of Frederick Lawrence (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989), xvii.
    6.eoff Eley, “Politics, Culture and the Public Sphere,” G positions: east asia cul-
    tures critique 10 (2002): 224.

  2. Eley, “Politics, Culture and the Public Sphere,” 224.
    8.ee Andrew Arato and Jean L. Cohen, S Civil Society and Political Theory
    (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992); John Keane, Democracy and Civil
    Society: On the Predicaments of European Socialism, the Prospects for
    Democracy, and the Problem of Controlling Social and Political Power
    (London: Verso, 1988); John Keane, Civil Society and the State: New
    European Perspectives (London: Verso, 1988); Ernesto Laclau and Chantal
    Mouffe, Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic
    Politics (London: Verso, 1985). For a critique, see Ellen Meiskins Wood,
    “The Uses and Abuses of ‘Civil Society,’” Socialist Register 60 (1990): 60–84.
    9.t is impossible to provide exhaustive citations here, but see, for example, I
    for the Middle East, Armando Salvatore and Dale F. Eickelman, eds.,
    Public Islam and the Common Good (Leiden: Brill, 2004). For China, see
    R. Bin Wong, “Great Expectations: The ‘Public Sphere’ and the Search for
    Modern Times in Chinese History,” Chugokushi Gaku [Studies in Chinese
    History] 3 (1993): 7–50; Philip C. C. Huang, “The Paradigmatic Crisis
    in Chinese Studies: Paradoxes in Social and Economic History,” Modern
    China 7 (1991): 299–341; Philip C. C. Huang, ed., “Symposium: ‘Public
    Sphere’/‘Civil Society’ in China: Paradigmatic Issues in Chinese Studies III,”
    Modern China 19 (1993). For Japan, see positions: east asia cultures critique,
    Special Issue 10 (2002).

Free download pdf