The Language of Argument

(singke) #1
1 2 8

C H A P T E R 6 ■ P r o p o s i t i o n a l L o g i c

TESTING FOR VALIDITY


What is the point of all this? In everyday life, we rarely run into an expression
as complicated as the one in our example at the end of the previous section.
Our purpose here is to sharpen our sensitivity to how truth- functional
connectives work and then to express our insights in clear ways. This is
important because the validity of many arguments depends on the logical
features of these truth-functional connectives. We can now turn directly to
this subject.
Earlier we saw that every argument with the form “p & q; ∴ p” will be
valid. This is obvious in itself, but we saw that this claim could be justified
by an appeal to truth tables. A truth table analysis shows us that an argu-
ment with this form can never have an instance in which the premise is true
and the conclusion is false. We can now apply this same technique to argu-
ments that are more complex. In the beginning, we will examine arguments
that are still easy to follow without the use of technical help. In the end,
we will consider some arguments that most people cannot follow without
guidance.
Consider the following argument:
Valerie is either a doctor or a lawyer.
Valerie is neither a doctor nor a stockbroker.
∴ Valerie is a lawyer.
We can use the following abbreviations:
D = Valerie is a doctor.
L = Valerie is a lawyer.
S = Valerie is a stockbroker.

Given that “A,” “B,” and “C” are true propositions and “X,” “Y,” and “Z” are
false propositions, determine the truth values of the following compound
propositions:


  1. ~X ∨ Y 9. ~(A ∨ (Z ∨ X))

  2. ~(X ∨ Y) 10. ~(A ∨ ~(Z ∨ X))

  3. ~(Z ∨ Z) 11. ~A ∨ ~(Z ∨ X)

  4. ~(Z ∨~Z) 12. ~Z ∨ (Z & A)

  5. ~ ~(A ∨ B) 13. ~(Z ∨ (Z & A))

  6. (A ∨ Z) & B 14. ~((Z ∨ Z) & A)

  7. (A ∨ X) & (B ∨ Z) 15. A ∨ ((~B & C) ∨~(~B ∨ ~(Z ∨ B)))

  8. (A & Z) ∨ (B & Z) 16. A & ((~B & C) n ~(~B ∨ ~(Z ∨ B)))


Exercise XII

97364_ch06_ptg01_111-150.indd 128 15/11/13 10:15 AM


some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materiallyCopyright 201^3 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights,
affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Free download pdf