Gender, state policy, and popular culture, 1865–1946,
Gainesville, Fla. 2002.
A. Brodsky, With all our strength. The Revolutionary
Association of the Women of Afghanistan, New York
2003.
P. Chatterjee, The nation and its fragments. Colonial and
postcolonial histories, Princeton, N.J. 1993.
N. Dupree, Revolutionary rhetoric and Afghan women,
in M. N. Shahrani and R. L. Canfield (eds.), Revolu-
tions and rebellions in Afghanistan, Berkeley 1984,
306–40.
D. Ellis, Women of the Afghan war, Westport, Conn.
2000.
H. Emadi, Repression, resistance, and women in Afghan-
istan, Westport, Conn. 2002.
H. Esfandiari, Reconstructed lives. Women and Iran’s
Islamic Revolution, Washington, D.C. 1997.
J. de Groot, Coexisting and conflicting identities. Women
and nationalisms in twentieth-century Iran, in R. R.
Pierson, N. Chaudhuri, and B. McAuley (eds.), Nation,
empire, colony. Historicizing gender and race, Bloom-
ington, Ind. 1998, 139–65.
V. Moghadam (ed.), Gender and national identity. Women
and politics in Muslim societies, Oxford 1994.
——,Identity politics and women. Cultural reassertions
and feminisms in international perspective, Boulder,
Colo. 1995.
A. Najmabadi, Hazards of modernity and morality.
Women, state, and ideology in contemporary Iran, in
D. Kandiyoti (ed.), Women, Islam, and the state,
Philadelphia 1991, 663–87.
——,The story of the daughters of Quchan. Gender and
national memory in Iranian history, Syracuse, N.Y.
1998.
G. Nashat, Women and revolution in Iran, Boulder, Colo.
1983.
P. Paidar, Women and the political process in twentieth-
century Iran, Cambridge 1995.
E. Sanasarian, The women’s rights movement in Iran.
Mutiny, appeasement, and repression from 1900 to
Khomeini, New York 1982.
F. Shirazi, The veil unveiled. The hijab in modern culture,
Gainesville, Fla. 2001.
N. Yuval-Davis, Woman, nation, state, New York 1989.
Fakhri Haghani
South Asia
Although South Asia is segmented along various
axes of difference – ethnic, caste, class, gender, reli-
gion, language – the mobilization of these identities
is the result of particular configurations of local
and global political, social, and economic forces
and of the emergence of specific constituencies and
identity politics based on new forms of politicized
religion. Located in a broader crisis of modernity
and state legitimacy, identity politics based on
politicized religion are modernist with a clear polit-
ical project for control over the state and imposi-
tion of their agenda on others. This was seen in the
Islamization campaign during Zia ul-Haq’s regime
in Pakistan, under General Ershad’s rule in Bangla-
desh, and in the propagation of the Hindutva ide-
286 identity politics
ology espoused by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party
in India.
Since the 1980s a new configuration and redefin-
ition of the contours and boundaries of the state,
community, and the family in the region has
emerged. Multiple identities are being particular-
ized into singular religion-based identities imposed
through force as well as embraced through affinity.
Women in particular have been subject to contra-
dictory political, economic, and social pressures
and they have defined themselves, and have been
defined and redefined, in their identities as women
and as members of a nation, community, caste, and
class group. That these identities are often at the
cost of equal citizenship rights is epitomized by the
following statement by Nur Jahan, a working class
Muslim feminist from India: “If by making separate
laws for Muslim women, you are trying to say that
we are not citizens of this country, then why don’t
you tell us clearly and unequivocally that we should
establish another country – not Hindustan or
Pakistan but Auratstan [women’s land]” (Chhachhi
1994, 74).
The characterization of the emergence of politi-
cized religion in the region is contested. Analysts
continue to debate whether contemporary states
and particular religio-political identity groups
should be labeled fundamentalist, communalist,
nationalist, Islamist, majoritarian, fascist, or right-
wing – each characterization reflecting particular
political positionings. Although there are varia-
tions in the strength of politicized religion in each
country there are common features in the ways in
which the boundaries of the nation/community/
family are constructed, (re)defined and protected
with women/gender relations figuring as a crucial
marker and signifier of identity.
A key determinant of identity politics in the
South Asian region today is the role of the state in
mobilizing and reproducing politicized religious
identities. The process of the formation of India,
Pakistan, and Bangladesh was itself based on an
ideological mobilization that equated the nation
with a particular community identity, despite
avowals of secularism. The often forced recovery of
women abducted by both sides during Indian parti-
tion was cast within a discourse of protection/ con-
tamination/control over women’s bodies in which
citizenship was defined in religious community
terms. In India and Pakistan each side emphasizes
its difference through external discourses and inter-
nal processes of “othering” through the media, his-
tory textbooks, and popular discourses, often using
the masculine/feminine dualism to bolster a milita-
rized masculinity.