Appendix 3.03 Survey of The Neurosciences
and Music III Conference 2008
Disorders and Plasticity
Title, Category
AimMus. Material, Cultural Ref.Technology & ProcedureMain focus of interestConclusion- Palmer et al.
(470-480)Neural correlates of contextual effectsCat. 13: Expectation
Cat. 15: Structure 69S. Lidji et al.
(481-484)MMN to vowel and pitch
Cat.1: Pitch
Cat. 6: Phonemes
70S. Neuhaus et al.
(485
-489)
ERP study on musical form perception
Cat. 15: Musical form
71S. Nguyen et al.
(490
-493)
Tonal language processing in amusia Cat. 6: Language
Cat. 11: DeficitTo investigate neural responsesto timbral,temporal, and melodic
accentsastheycoexist in alonger melodic context To investigate whether vowel and pitch changes are processed as integrated or
separated units at an early preattentive level indexed by theMismatch Negativity
(MMN) in sung stimuliTo investigate how consecutive phrase patterns in the musical form types AABB and ABAB are conjoined perceptually
To examine the transfer of deficitbetween music andlanguage by examining the effects of impaired musical pitch perception on the discrimination of lexical tonesMelodic tones: piano timbre. Timbre deviants: steel guitar.
6 Melodies of 17 isochronous tones systematically combining a) ascending-descending patterns. b) no, one, ortwo temporal accents. c) no,or one timbral deviant tone
CR: Western
Standards: two synthesized vowels sung on C3 (130 Hz) and C#3 (138 Hz). Deviants: pitch height, vowel identity, or both
CR: Neutral 150 8-bar piano melodies inC, E and Ab major. Half of them were of type AABB, half type ABAB
CR: Western
98 words spoken by a female native speaker of Mandarin Chinese, with 1 of 4 possible tones: level, mid-rising,dipping, and high-falling toneCR: French/ChineseEEG: Event-related potentialresponses(ERPs)tomelodies. 16 musically trained young adult listeners. Task in
order to ensure attentive processing:Indicate timbrechanges at the end of each trial
EEG:Event-RelatedPotentials (ERP) recordedfrom 12 nonmusicians watching a silent movie, while sequences of repetitive standard sounds and rare deviants were presented through headphones
EEG:Event-RelatedPotentials (ERP) recordedfrom 16 nonexpert listeners. Task: to evaluate whether adjacent or nonadjacent patterns are related to each other
20 amusic and 20 control French-speakingparticipantslistened to pairs of words, half using same tone, half using different tones.Task: Judgesame or differentDetection accuracyand ERPswere measured for the accent manipulations. Grand average group data for Mismatch Negativity (MMN) andP300 responses
Whether Mismatch Negativity (MMN) responses produce additive effects when manipulated simultaneously in a single stimulus (doubledeviant) Grand average ERPs for form types AABB and ABAB. Especiallyan anteriorN300To assess whether amusic individuals would be able to discriminate pitch variations in an unfamiliar languageListeners’ neural responses to musical structurechanged systematically as sequential predictability and listeners’ expectations changed across the melodic context MMNto vowel and pitchdeviants did not show significant additivity. Suggestion: vowel and pitch are processed by shared neural substrates at thepreattentive level
73% of melodies evaluated as ”hierarchical”. ERP data show that brain responses are strongly affected by form type, but do not correlate with the rating decisions
Even if the amusic group performed significantly belowthe control group, there was a high degree of overlap between the scores obtained by amusics and controls