Forensic dental radiography 195
Protection of x-ray operators and surrounding personnel is provided by
the patient protection practices detailed above and by workplace wall shield-
ing and the maintenance of proper operator distance. Operators must be able
to stand at least 2 m away from the source of x-ray scatter (i.e., the patient’s
head) and out of the primary beam (Figure 10.3). If this is done, no barrier
is required. If the operator cannot stand at this desired distance, a protective
barrier or apron must then be provided. Most published research shows that
x-ray doses in dentistry continue to decline. This is most likely due to the
dramatic reduction in exposure times brought about by high-speed film and
even more so by direct digital receptors.
10.7.2 Personnel Monitoring
The decision of whether dental personnel are monitored for x-ray exposure
depends on state law and the expected exposure predicted on the basis of
workload and protective measures. The NCRP recommends monitoring to all
personnel who are likely to receive an effective dose greater than 1 mSv/year.
Many states require monitoring only if the exposure will exceed one-tenth
of the applicable MPD (5 mSv). Past studies of occupational exposure to a
large sample of dental personnel have shown that the typical exposure is less
than the minimum detectable dose, or less than 1 mSv/year.12,13 These data
Table 10.2 Maximum Permissible Doses for Dental Operators
Occupational 50 mSv annual effective dose
10 mSv × age (y) maximum cumulative effective dose
Public 5 mSv annual effective dose for infrequent exposure
Embryo and fetus 0.5 mSv equivalent dose in a month from occupational exposure
of the mother once pregnancy is known
Annual U.S. background 3.65 mSv per year
Public MPDs are one-tenth that of those who are occupationally exposed.
Posterior
Anterior
Primary
Beam
Exit
RightLift
X
X Primary Beam
Entrance
Figure 10.3 Graphic showing typical scatter pattern involved when exposing
a specimen. the safer areas are behind, indicated by X. (plotted from data from
de haan and van aken.^11 )