Forensic Dentistry, Second Edition

(Barré) #1

Jurisprudence and legal issues 393


the reversal of over a dozen criminal convictions based at least in part on
bitemark evidence proclaims.


References



  1. Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923).

  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125,
    L.Ed2d 469 (1993).

  3. General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136, 118 S.Ct. 512, 139 L.Ed.2d 508 (1997).

  4. Kumho Tire v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 119 S.Ct. 1167, 143 L.Ed.2d 238 (1999).

  5. Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 702 (as amended Apr. 17, 2000, eff. Dec. 1, 2000).

  6. Doyle v. State, 159 Tex. C.R. 310, 263 S.W.2d 779 (1954).

  7. Niehaus v. State, 359 N.E.2d 513, 265 Ind. 655 (Ind., 1977).

  8. Boyle v. Brigano, 25 F.3d 1047 (6th Cir., 1994, Cert. Denied).

  9. United States v. Holland, 378 F.Supp. 144 (E.D. Pa., 1974).

  10. Chafin v. State, 330 So.2d 599 (1976, Ala. Cir. App.).

  11. People v. Mattox, 96 Ill.App.2d 148, 237 N.E.2d 845 (Ill. App. 1 Dist., 1968).

  12. Dolvin v. State, 391 So.2d 666 (Ala. Cr. App., 1979).

  13. Ex Parte Suis Dolvin, 391 So.2d 677 (Ala. Sup. Crt.).

  14. Tompkins v. Singletary, (1998 U.S. Dist. Lexis 22582, Fla. Mid. Dist.).

  15. Tompkins v. Moore, 193 F.3d 1327 (11th Cir., 1999).

  16. People v. Mayens, (2008 Cal. App. Unpub. Lexis 4375).

  17. Buntin v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 521 N.Y.S.2d 258, 134 A.D.2d 473
    (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept., 1987).

  18. Sheker v. State, 644 P.2d 560 (Okla. Crim. App., 1982).

  19. Com. v. Spencer, 275 A.2d 299, 442 Pa. 328 (Pa., 1971).

  20. Nash v. NYC, 806 N.Y.S.2d 446 (Sup. Crt. App. Team, 1st Dept, 2005).

Free download pdf