The Drawings of Michelangelo and His Followers in the Ashmolean Museum

(nextflipdebug5) #1

P 1 : KsF
0521551331 c 01 -p 3 CUNY 160 /Joannides 052155 133 1 January 11 , 2007 10 : 14


CATALOGUE 51 WHOLLY OR PARTIALLY AUTOGRAPH SHEETS 245

Condition
The sheet has minor abrasions, fibrous accretions, adhe-
sive staining, general uneven discolouration, and foxing.
The primary support is drummed by the four edges to
the backboard of the mount so the verso is not visible.

Discussion
The pose of this figure study is similar to those found on
two other sheets of drawings in the Ashmolean Museum,
Cats. 52 and 53 (the three were mounted together when
they entered the Museum), and a fourth, formerly in
the Gathorne-Hardy Collection at Donnington Priory,
now in the National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.
( 1991. 217. 2 a- 3 b/Corpus 429 ;black chalk, drawn on
recto and verso, 233 × 100 mm). All the drawings, seven
in total, on these sheets, portray advancing male figures,
seen from the front, one shoulder advanced and the other
drawn back, with the forward arm curved down across the
body and the other held up, as though supporting some-
thing. All four sheets are obviously fragments of larger

ones, but it seems unlikely that any two came from the
same sheet: None of the three Ashmolean drawings is
made on the same paper.
It might nevertheless be the case that the drawings upon
these four sheets were made at the same time for the
same project. However, despite the resemblances among
them, this is probably not the case, and the drawings
are best treated separately. It is clear that in his last years
Michelangelo employed and re-employed a limited num-
ber of poses and that a repeated pose does not necessarily
indicate a repeated context.
The present sheet is drawn on one side only. The form
is nude, like that at the left side of Cat. 52 , and the draw-
ings on both sides of the Washington, D.C., sheet, but the
internal movement of the body here receives somewhat
more emphasis than in those drawings, which might sug-
gest a slightly earlier date. The figure is most readily inter-
preted as supporting the body of Christ in anEntombment
or, more properly, aTr ansport of Christ’s Body to the Tomb.
In his late years, Michelangelo frequently returned to the
themes and forms of his youth and his late treatments of
theEntombmentrecall his painting in the National Gallery,
London, generally dated soon after15 0 0(NG 790 ;oilon
wood, 161. 7 × 149. 9 cm). Michelangelo’s late inventions
could have been intended as Presentation Drawings or as
models for paintings to be carried out by other artists –
it is improbable that he himself still considered execut-
ing paintings. Such designs for painting should probably
be distinguished from treatments of the same or related
subjects planned for sculpture, such as those in Cat. 48 ,
which are more simplified, but, finally, any distinctions
are tenuous since sculpture and painting (and, for that
matter, Presentation Drawings andmodelli) easily merge
into one another in Michelangelo’s work.
Probably around155 0 or a little later, Michelangelo
planned an elaborate pictorial composition of theLamen-
tationin the immediate aftermath of theDepositionin
anow-fragmentary autograph drawing in Haarlem (A 35
verso /VT 65 /Corpus 434 ;black chalk, c. 300 × 305 mm).
This contains the traces of at least seven figures, and it
may have been a preparatory study for a lost cartoon of a
Piet`acontaining nine figures, recorded in Michelangelo’s
posthumous inventory (see Cat. 40 ), about which nothing
further seems to be known. However, the Haarlem draw-
ing does not have supporting figures at either side in poses
like those of any of the drawings under present consider-
ation, and although no firm statement can be made about
the lost cartoon, it seems likely that this did not either.
The present drawing and the Washington, D.C., sheet
have also been connected with a five-figure composition –
in which all figures are entirely nude – of theEntombment.
Free download pdf