P 1 : JZP
0521551335 int 1 CUNY 160 /Joannides 052155 133 1 January 11 , 2007 9 : 28
18 THE DRAWINGS OF MICHELANGELO AND HIS FOLLOWERS IN THE ASHMOLEAN MUSEUM
they concerned Medici projects, was an act of defiance
that angered Cosimo – rarely given to open admission of
emotion – sufficiently for him to say so in a letter to his
representative in Rome.^106
Leonardo Buonarroti had to find ways of placating the
ruler, evidence of whose irrational behaviour and mental
decline was becoming apparent. He presented to Cosimo
five statues that had been left in Michelangelo’s Floren-
tine workshop and that Cosimo had wished to purchase as
early as15 4 4: TheVictory, nearly finished, which Cosimo
placed in the Salone of Palazzo Vecchio, and the rela-
tively unfinished four largeprigioni, which, at Cosimo’s
command, were installed by Bernardo Buontalenti in the
grotto he constructed in the gardens of Palazzo Pitti. All
these figures, of course, had been made for the tomb
of Julius II and had no connection with the Medici. In
addition, Leonardo made an effort to find further fin-
ished drawings for Cosimo: He recovered – no doubt
with pressure – from Michelangelo’s pupil Jacomo del
Duca, to whom the master had presumably given them,
Michelangelo’scartonettiof theAnnunciationand theAgony
in the Garden, which Marcello Venusti had executed as
paintings but which he did not himself own. Leonardo
gave them to Cosimo, who seems to have put them on
display, no doubt framed and glazed. Both are now in
the Uffizi, sadly damaged by over-exposure.^107 Also in
15 6 4, died the earliest recipient of Michelangelo’s Pre-
sentation Drawings, Gherardo Perini. He had owned at
least three finished drawings by the master, and these too
were acquired by Cosimo, also to be displayed and, con-
sequently, degraded.^108 Ironically, these drawings, all of
which have a continuous provenance and the best possi-
ble claims to authenticity, were doubted in the twentieth
century by adherents of “scientific” criticism.
It seems likely, under such circumstances, that
Leonardo would not have risked retaining Presentation
Drawings by Michelangelo, but sketches, perhaps even
quite developed sketches, were another matter, and, as
farasisknown, Cosimo evinced no interest in these. It
cannot be ruled out that such drawings, or some of them,
werepresented to Cosimo and subsequently returned
to Casa Buonarroti by his grandson, but, on balance,
it seems more likely that they remained in Leonardo’s
house: Whether he attempted to supplement them is
unknown. Leonardo died in15 9 3, and Casa Buonar-
roti was then taken over by his son, Michelangelo the
Younger, Michelangelo’s great nephew and namesake.
Michelangelo the Younger was the man most responsible
for turning Casa Buonarroti into a museum and shrine
of his ancestor. He commissioned a series of paintings on
the biography of Michelangelo from some of the leading
contemporary Florentine painters and installed them in a
gallery. Michelangelo the Younger was a significant poet
and litterateur, and he was also concerned to vaunt the
literary achievements of his ancestor, of whose poems he
published the first edition in 1623.
Probably in connection with the planning of this edi-
tion, Michelangelo the Younger acquired either directly
from the architect Bernardo Buontalenti ( 1536 – 1608 ),
perhaps Michelangelo’s most intelligent and inventive
interpreter in architecture and decoration in the later six-
teenth century, or from Buontalenti’s heirs, an unknown
number of sheets of drawings by Michelangelo including
five that also contained poems, which he described with
sufficient clarity to be identifiable.^109 How and where
Buontalenti had obtained these sheets is unknown, but
at least one had belonged to the Irregular Numbering
Collector (to be discussed later), and it is likely that some
of the scrappier sketches had simply strayed in one man-
ner or another from Michelangelo’s studio and had been
acquired by Buontalenti piecemeal.
It is also worth noting that drawings arrived in Casa
Buonarroti from other sources. At least three drawings
seem to have come from the Irregular Numbering series
and another, smaller, group is also identifiable by the
roman numerals in red chalk to be found on some
sheets – mostly but not entirely containing architectural
drawings – most of which are still in Casa Buonarroti
butofwhich at least one – with a provenance from
Bernardo Buontalenti and Casa Buonarroti – is now in
the Ashmolean (Cat. 56 ). Because these roman numer-
als are found on drawings made by Michelangelo at very
different periods, it is probable that they were applied
only after his death in15 6 4.They were presumably due
neither to Buontalenti nor to a member of the Buonar-
roti family because they were not applied uniformly to
other drawings known to have been owned by Buontal-
enti or the Buonarroti. Perhaps they represent a group of
drawings, initially in possession of another owner, who
might be dubbed the Roman Numeral Collector, that
entered the collection of Bernardo Buontalenti and/or
Casa Buonarroti during the lifetime of Michelangelo the
Younger. If that is so, then all sheets so numbered must
have been acquired from the Roman Numeral Collec-
tor by Buontalenti and/or the Buonarroti, since none are
known for which any other provenance can be demon-
strated. The fact that the numbers are now discontinuous
may indicate no more than that other sheets have been
trimmed.
In addition to his efforts to put Michelangelo’s lit-
erary reputation on a firm footing, Michelangelo the
Younger was concerned to expand the family collection