The Business of Value Investing.pdf

(Romina) #1
144 The Business of Value Investing

trading at $ 65. I held the shares for four years, the fi rst two of which
I was down on my investment. In the end, my gains were in excess
of 300 percent.
This stroll down memory lane is not meant to defend the notion
that it is always best to sit and wait out your investments. Every
market correction and economic recession is different in terms of
duration and ultimate severity. But where the market hasn ’ t failed
investors is in restoring fair valuations to those businesses that are
capable of earning more and more profi t. No single business can
ever expect to generate continuous increasing profi tability. What
matters is how the business will look several years down the road. If
that particular business will be earning more profi ts and generating
greater levels of cash fl ow, the market price will catch up to its fun-
damental performance.
It ’ s very diffi cult for investors to sit on 50 percent - plus losses
and not be tempted to sell out. If you ’ re managing money for
others, it ’ s nearly impossible to hold such losses and not do any-
thing. The principal reason many investment funds fail is because
many investment managers feel pressured to deliver short - term
results to their clients. In many cases, this pressure stems from
the fact that many investors are taught to focus on short - term
returns. Money managers with the greatest yearly return are
rewarded with an infl ux of new capital, and managers with an
underperforming year can fi nd themselves out of a job. While the
ultimate success or failure of an investment manager will depend
on his track record, the majority of individuals are taught to think
of outcome fi rst and process second. This backward approach to
evaluating investment results is just as foolish as suggesting that
Buffett had “ lost his touch ” because he failed to participate in the
Internet boom. Many investors are quick to discount discipline
and are eager to participate in whatever is popular. The conse-
quence of such thinking is a lose - lose proposition for both man-
ager and investor.

CH007.indd 144CH007.indd 144 9/2/09 11:47:27 AM9/2/09 11:47:27 AM

Free download pdf