Sports Medicine: Just the Facts

(やまだぃちぅ) #1

  • Injury to teeth and alveolar processes represent 84.5%
    of injuries (Sane, Ylipaavalniemi, and Leppanen,
    1988).
    a. Ice hockey accounts for roughly 40% of all sports-
    related dental injuries (Hayrinen-Immonen et al,
    1990).
    •Maxillofacial injuries have been drastically reduced
    since the introduction of mandatory facemasks in
    many levels of the sport (Sane, Ylipaavalniemi, and
    Leppanen, 1988).

  • 47% of the above reported facial injuries may have
    been preventable through the use of protective visors
    (Lorentzon et al, 1988).

  • Studies have shown the use of helmets with facemasks
    significantly reduces (but does not completely elimi-
    nate) the incidence of facial lacerations (Benson et al,
    1999; LaPrade et al, 1995; Murray and Livingston,
    1995).
    a. Number of game induced facial lacerations with-
    out facemask =70 per 1000 player-game hours
    (Lorentzon et al, 1988; Lorentzon, Wedren, and
    Pietila, 1988).
    b. Number of game induced facial lacerations with
    facemask =14.7–15.1 per 1000 player-game hours
    (LaPrade et al, 1995).
    c. Number of practice induced facial lacerations
    without facemask =21.8 per 1000 player-practice
    hours (Lorentzon et al, 1988; Lorentzon, Wedren,
    and Pietila, 1988).
    d. Number of practice induced facial lacerations with
    facemask =0.0–0.2 per 1000 player-practice hours
    (LaPrade et al, 1995).

  • Despite facemasks, facial lacerations still occur, and
    the team physician should be prepared to evaluate and
    repair these injuries appropriately.

  • Cervical Spine:The effect of helmet and facemask
    use on cervical spine injury—the controversy.
    a. After the increased use of helmets with facemasks
    in ice hockey, there retrospectively appeared to be
    an increasing incidence of cervical spine injury.
    Several investigators hypothesize that this is
    caused as a result of the player wearing a helmet
    adopting a more aggressive style of play resulting
    in more cervical injury (Murray and Livingston,
    1995; Reynen and Clancy, Jr, 1994). It has been
    proposed that the protective devices have also
    altered how officials perceive game situations,
    leading them to be more lenient in penalization.
    The net result has been an increase in illegal and
    injurious behaviors, such as checking from behind
    (an activity associated with catastrophic cervical
    spine injury) (Murray and Livingston, 1995).
    b. However, LaPrade and colleagues’ prospective
    study of intercollegiate athletes and facemask use


showed no increase in head and neck injuries
(LaPrade et al, 1995).


  • Mechanism of injury is axial loading caused by a
    blow to the head from collision with the boards, other
    players, the ice, or the goal post (Tator, 1987).

  • Many of the reported cervical spine injuries were a
    result of either illegal play or high-risk aggressive
    behavior. New rules have been instituted by both the
    Canadian Amateur Hockey Association and USA
    Hockey in an attempt to reduce the number of spinal
    cord injuries. These new rules have moved the action
    away from the boards and restricted checking; prelim-
    inary results appear successful in limiting the inci-
    dence of complete spinal cord injuries (Tator, Carson,
    and Edmonds, 1998).

  • Shoulder:Clavicle fractures, acromioclavicular joint
    separations, and glenohumeral subluxation/disloca-
    tion are relatively common in ice hockey (Minkoff,
    Varoltta, and Simonson, 1994; Bahr, Bendiksen, and
    Engerbretsen, 1995; Thompson, and Scoles, 2000).
    They usually are a high velocity injury, which is the
    result of the shoulder be driven into the boards fol-
    lowing aggressive body checks.

  • Elbow:A player who does not wear elbow pads may
    receive a traumatic olecranon bursitis and/or elbow
    fracture during collision with the ice or the boards.

  • Wrist, hand: When hockey players fight (which
    occurs frequently at higher levels of play), the gloves
    are typically thrown down, and blows are exchanged
    using bare hands. The typical street fighter hand
    injuries can then occur.

  • Gamekeeper’s thumb (ulnar collateral ligament
    injury) has been reported (Sim et al, 1988) and is typ-
    ically due to the player’s thumb being hyperabducted
    when the stick handle is suddenly forced toward the
    body during a collision with the boards.

  • Wartenberg’s syndrome:In hockey, direct trauma to
    the superficial radial nerve at the wrist can occur when
    an opponent strikes the distal forearm with the stick. The
    athlete will complain of pain and/or parasthesias shoot-
    ing up the thumb and dorsal wrist in a radial distribution
    (Nuber, Assenmacher, and Bowen, 1998). Players who
    use gloves with shorter cuffs (so as to increase wrist
    mobility) are at increased risk for this injury.

  • Scaphoid fracture:Mechanism of injury usually is
    fall on outstretched hand or a dorsiflexed wrist collid-
    ing with the boards. The gloves provide some protec-
    tion against this injury.

  • Chest:Commotio cordis has been reported in youth
    ice hockey (Maron et al, 2002). League organizers
    and physicians should consider having an automated
    electric defibrillator(AED) available at the rink, as
    there is a 16% survival with rapid defibrillation
    (Maron et al, 2002).


510 SECTION 6 • SPORTS-SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS

Free download pdf