Mathematical Principles of Theoretical Physics

(Rick Simeone) #1

170 CHAPTER 3. MATHEMATICAL FOUNDATIONS


Proof.Assertion (1) follows directly from the following classical formula for the first eigen-
valueλ 1 of (3.6.5):


λ 1 = min
ψ∈H 01 (Ω,Cm)

1


||ψ||L 2



[


(Dψ)†(Dψ)+ψ†Aψ

]


dx.

We now prove Assertion (2) by contradiction. Assume that it is not true, thenK>N. By
Theorem3.34, theKfunctionsψjin (3.6.15) can be expended as


(3.6.16) ψj=


N

i= 1

αjiei+



l= 1

βjlφl for 1≤j≤K,

whereei( 1 ≤i≤N)andφlare eigenfunctions corresponding to negative and nonnegative
eigenvalues. SinceK>N, there exists aK-th order matrixPsuch that


(3.6.17) Pα=


(


0 ··· 0



)


,


where


α=




α 11 ··· α 1 N
..
.

..


.


αK 1 ··· αKN



 withαijas in(^3.^6.^16 ).

Thus, under the transformationP,


(3.6.18) ψ ̃=P


(


ψ
0

)


∈EK, ψ= (ψ 1 ,···,ψN)T,

whereEKis as in (3.6.15).
However, by (3.6.14) and (3.6.15), the first termψ ̃ 1 in (3.6.18) can be expressed in the
form


(3.6.19) ψ ̃ 1 =




l= 1

θlφl∈EK.

Note thatφlare the eigenfunctions corresponding to the nonnegative eigenvalues of (3.6.5).
Hence we have




[(Dψ ̃ 1 )†(Dψ ̃ 1 )+ψ ̃† 1 Aψ ̃ 1 ]dx=



ψ ̃† 1 (−D^2 ψ ̃ 1 +Aψ ̃ 1 )dx=



l= 1

(3.6.20) |θl|^2 λl> 0.


Hereλl≥0 are the nonnegative eigenvalues of (3.6.5). Hence we derive, from (3.6.19) and
(3.6.20), a contradiction with the assumption in Assertion (2). Theproof of the theorem is
complete.

Free download pdf