general adjustment was not confirmed. Supervisor support did not have any
significant influence on adjustment. Cultural novelty and spousal adjustment
had a very strong impact on general adjustment and a weaker, though still very
significant, impact on interaction adjustment. Spousal adjustment did not
influence work adjustment. The two self-efficacy variables seemed completely
unrelated to adjustment, but contrary to the authors’ expectations both the
number of previous assignments and language fluency have a significant positive
direct effect on interaction adjustment.
As expected, both previous experience and language fluency had impor-
tant moderating effects as well. Previous experience moderated the relationship
between supervisor and co-worker support. For expatriates on their first assign-
ments, supervisor support was negatively related to all aspects of adjustment,
272 International Human Resource Management
* Numbers in parentheses indicate the corresponding dependent variables. Underlined relationships
were confirmed.
Job factors
+ Role clarity (1)
+ Role discretion (1)
− Role conflict (1)
− Role novelty (1) (3)
Organisational factors
+ Supervisor support (2)
+ Co-worker support (2)
+ Logistical support (2,3)
Non-work factors
− Culture novelty (2,3)
+ Spouse adjustment (1,2,3)
Individual factors
+ Achievement self-efficacy (1,2,3)
+ Social self-efficacy (1,2,3)
+ Previous assignments (1,2,3)
+ Language fluency (1,2,3)
Expatriate adjustment
(1) Work
(2) Interaction
(3) General
FIGURE 10.2
Determinants of expatriate adjustment (adapted from Black et al., 1991
and Shaffer et al., 1999)*