Cultural Geography

(Nora) #1
identities, or so the theory goes. In a geographical
reading of Foucault’s The Birth of the Clinic
(1973), Chris Philo (2000) reintroduces Foucault’s
interlocking ‘spatializations’, rooted in the inten-
sification of medicine after the French Revolu-
tion as well as the shifts in attitudes toward
medicines in France in the eighteenth and
nineteenth centuries.Even though Philo argues
that this work is inspirational in spite ofits histor-
ical and geographical specificity, we would argue
that Foucault’s work is compelling precisely
because of its specificity. Considering past
configurations of spatialities of subjectivities is but
one strategy geographers use to embody subjectiv-
ities and spatialities. Other strategies include trans-
forming space through discourse on the body
(Robinson, 2000), unsettling space through uncertain
bodily boundaries (Wakeford, 1998), transgressing
space through bodily movement (Longhurst, 2001)
and imagining space through socially imposed
exile (Munt, 1998).

Challenging binary categories through
problematizing the body

The body has become a lucrative site of theoretical
attempts to overcome various binary categories,
such as male/female, masculine/feminine, culture/
nature and discourse/materiality. By problema-
tizing the body through conceptualizing it as
multifaceted with multiple sets of complex links
into itself and to the external world, geographers
are challenging dichotomous thinking in ways
that cast difference, self and subjectivity as fluid
categories resistant to either overdetermination
of structural imperatives or unrestricted agency
with full free will (another binary). One particu-
larly popular approach to understanding the body
in various contexts is understanding categories of
difference as performative, ‘constituting the
identity it is purported to be’ (Butler, 1990: 25).
Elaborating performativity even outside theatrics
has proven to be useful in courting the notion that
identities, for example, are imitative, caught up
in a cycle of mimicry outside a pre-given state of
being, with space within their reiteration for nor-
mative and resistant acts. Thus, differentiation
and related processes such as subjectivation,
sexualization and racialization of the self are set
up within a space with no fixed representation.
Representations themselves are fluid, imitative,
mimicked and reiterative. Earlier spatial engage-
ments of performativity focused on understand-
ing bodies in space and their meanings. For
example, Linda McDowell and Gill Court (1994)
looked at how gendered representations abound
in the finance industry. They showed how gender

performances of ‘working bodies’ in banks have
shifted within the previous,financially volatile
decade. In another early work, David Bell et al.
(1994) contrasted hyper-sexualized spaces of gay
skinheads and lipstick lesbians with the predomi-
nant, normalizing heterosexual spaces of every-
day life. In performing hyper-gendered roles in
hegemonic spaces, bodies can continually recon-
stitute meanings of their identities and subvert
meanings of everyday spaces. More recent studies
in performativity tend to draw more widely on
performance theorists and promote a more
nuanced appreciation of the insight such a
theoretical framework can offer. Rather than
engaging in the closely associated gender, sex
and sexuality studies of performativity, Nicky
Gregson and Gillian Rose (2000) argue that
spaces, too, need to be thought of as performa-
tive. To illustrate their point, they expand topi-
cally into understanding the narratives of a group
of community arts workers and the phenomenon
of observing and participating in car-boot sales
while simultaneously highlighting academic
performances related to research and writing. In
contrast to the relatively open spaces of commu-
nity arts workers and car-boot sales, Teresa
Dirsuweit (1999) maps a space heavily controlled
through surveillance. She examines the coded
sexual performances of prisoners in a South
African women’s prison expressing same-sex
sexuality and engaging butch–femme roles. She
found that performances of gender and sexuality
were space-specific. Performativity matters in
studies of subjectivity in that it has the potential
to break open binary categories by mediating
interpretations of bodily activities and demon-
strating how space is intermingled with cate-
gories, constructs and expressions of the
complexities of the manifestations of identity.

GEOGRAPHIES OF BODIES
AND EMBODIED GEOGRAPHIES

These intellectual passages within geography –
examining the body as a site of regulation,
oppression and control; delving into embodied
subjectivity and spatiality; and challenging
binary categories through problematizing the
body – are manifested in a wide range of work on
the body, in the sense of both geographies of
bodies and embodied geographies. For the most
part, geographers have been preoccupied with
trying to tease out the complexities of linkages
among bodies and spaces, in the sense both of
theorizing body and of recognizing and utilizing
knowledge emerging from bodies. These

64 RETHINKING THE SOCIAL

3029-ch02.qxd 03-10-02 11:39 AM Page 64

Free download pdf